He needed that reinforcement of courage to endure the dinner which he
was obliged to eat that evening at the club on Rue Scribe, sitting
opposite M. de Claviers. The latter had transmitted to him his commands
to that effect, as had been agreed, in a note which contained this line
only: "Dinner at the club, at eight o'clock."--He needed it again, and
more, the next day, to consent to take his seat beside the marquis, at
ten o'clock, in the box at the Opéra which had been Madame de
Claviers'. Charles Jaubourg had passed so many evenings there gazing at
his mistress enthroned in all the splendor of her social royalty.
Something of that liaison floated still about the hangings of the box,
which the châtelain of Grandchamp had retained in pious regard for her
memory.
And what courage again, on the days that followed, to appear at banquet
after banquet, at reception after reception, always beside that
companion, who, in the presence of witnesses, continued to treat him
with the old-time warmth and cordiality! And as soon as they were alone,
in the automobile which took them from or to the house, not a word, not
a glance; and upon that face, more haggard and more aged from day to
day, was the stamp of the haughty grief that will never complain or
forgive.
How many times, as they drove home thus, Landri was tempted to ask: "Are
you satisfied with me?"
Satisfied! What a word to be uttered between them! Would the time ever
come when he could utter a different word? when he could say to him: "I
know the name of the anonymous villain who wrote that infamous letter.
Here are the other documents that he threatened you with?"
Between the moments that he passed in this way, in this heart-rending
attitude of dissimulation before the world, and the hours which he had
at once adopted the delicious habit of devoting, every afternoon, to the
comforter of Rue Monsieur, his only preoccupation was this: to find a
scent and follow it. But what scent? But how?
"I must proceed upon the definite facts," he said to himself the first
day. Now, what were these "definite facts?" That the sending of Madame
de Claviers' letter to her husband was coincident with the publication
of Jaubourg's will. What could the sender have hoped? That M. de
Claviers would refuse to accept the property. Who would have profited by
his refusal? The heirs-at-law. It was advisable therefore to investigate
in that direction, leaving Privat out of the question. Landri knew that
officer too well to suppose for an instant that he, who was rich in his
own right and through his wife, would have been guilty of so base an
action. For whose benefit, indeed? The Privats had no children.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account