The young man had not left Joseph ten minutes before this explanation
had taken shape in his mind. It rested upon a series of almost fantastic
hypotheses: that Chaffin knew of the existence of Madame de Claviers'
letters; that he knew where Jaubourg kept them locked up; that Pierre
Chaffin was in connivance with his father; that the strong-box had not a
combination lock. But nothing appeared fantastic to Landri since the
terrible scene during which he had learned the secret of his birth. When
everything of which we were certain, which was, as it were, a part of
us,--loving regard for a mother's memory, respectful affection for a
father, family pride, assurance of social rank,--has crumbled at one
stroke, nothing surprises us. The most extraordinary events seem simple
to us.
Not one of these difficulties deterred Landri. The one thing that he did
not understand was Chaffin's interest in the theft and in the
denunciation that followed it. From the moment that he knew that his
former tutor was capable of malversation in managing the property of
such a man as the marquis, he adjudged him a scoundrel and capable of
the worst crimes. He remembered the step he had undertaken at the time
of his last visit to Grandchamp, and he interpreted it as being in
pursuance of one of his detestable schemes: to precipitate a disaster
under cover of which his peculations would pass unnoticed. All this was
true, but it came in collision with the further "definite fact," that
the denunciatory letter, according to M. de Claviers' own testimony, was
sent some time before the dishonest manager was dismissed. So that
Chaffin could not have been guided, in sending it, by a desire for
revenge. But a man does not act without a motive, especially when the
inevitable consequence of his action is the ruin of two lives. At that
time Chaffin had no motive for committing that useless and barbarous
villainy. No. He must seek elsewhere.
"No motive?" the young man asked himself a few days later. He had
exhausted himself in hypotheses and efforts, each more unavailing than
the last, even to the point of taking the trouble to interview
personally all the people who had been in Jaubourg's service under
Joseph, and he returned to the hypothesis to which, in spite of all the
objections to it, an unconquerable instinct guided him. "But I know
absolutely nothing about that man, whom I thought I knew so well, and in
whom I was so deceived. I don't even know why he was dismissed. From
whom can I find out? Why, from Métivier, of course. Besides, I shall
need him in connection with my marriage."
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account