The West Riding Territorials in the Great WarMagnus, Laurie
History
The West Riding Territorials in the Great War
Magnus, Laurie
Great Britain. Army. Division, 49th; Great Britain. Army. Division, 62nd; World War, 1914-1918 -- Regimental histories -- Great Britain
Partly, then, the confusion arises from the distribution of the Troops
to outside Commands. But the mere fact of this distribution is itself
evidence to the difficulty of responsible leadership in those days; and,
before we attempt to draw a table of the activities of the Division in
place and time during the period covered by that Order, a brief survey
may be made from a more general point of view. ‘Every part earned high
praise from Commanders outside the Division’: we are concerned, then,
with outside Commands and with a wider outlook than the 49th Division’s.
We are concerned with Ludendorff’s point of view, so far as we are at
liberty to re-construct it. On a previous page we tried to show how the
German mind in March was divided between two strategic plans, one of
which pointed to Paris and the other to the Channel ports. Both were
pursued in turn, and even to some extent simultaneously, and either,
if successful, would have inflicted an almost irreparable blow on the
Allied forces of France and Britain. The point is, that neither quite
succeeded: the union of those Forces under Foch and the response of the
British Armies to Haig’s summons on April 13th, ‘WITH OUR BACKS TO THE
WALL, AND BELIEVING IN THE JUSTICE OF OUR CAUSE, EACH OF US MUST FIGHT
TO THE END,’ were to prove incalculably more effective than all the odds
combined against them. But the initiative in April was with the Germans.
So soon as one plan miscarried, or was left standing, or was conveniently
broken off, they were able to call the other plan, and to make a new push
with fresh Troops. The initiative was theirs, and the superiority was
theirs, in numbers and (by the offensive) in surprise. ‘The possibility
of a German attack North of the La Bassée Canal had been brought to my
notice,’ wrote Sir Douglas Haig, ‘prior to the 21st March. Indications
that preparations for a hostile attack in this sector were nearing
completion had been observed in the first days of April.’[112] But no
observations, however accurate, and no prevision, however acute, could
organize fifty-eight Divisions to fight battles in two sectors at one
time. Forty of the fifty-eight Divisions had been engaged in the Second
Battle of the Somme, and ‘the steps which I could take,’ he continued,
‘to meet a danger which I could foresee were limited by the fact that,
though the enemy’s progress on the Somme had for the time being been
stayed, ... [he] was in a position to take immediate advantage of any
weakening of my forces in that area.’[113] And to initiative, numbers and
surprise was added the fortune of the weather. The early spring had been
‘unseasonably fine,’ and the low-lying ground in the Lys Valley dried up
in time for the Germans to anticipate a relief of the Portuguese, who
were holding the front to the South of Armentières, and who had been in
the line for several months. A shattering German assault fell suddenly
(April 9th) on this thin-spread Portuguese Division, already overdue
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account