The West Riding Territorials in the Great WarMagnus, Laurie
History
The West Riding Territorials in the Great War
Magnus, Laurie
Great Britain. Army. Division, 49th; Great Britain. Army. Division, 62nd; World War, 1914-1918 -- Regimental histories -- Great Britain
The military confusion at home during the period prior to the passing
of the first National Service Act, and prolonged to some extent through
1916, though it never affected the keenness and enthusiasm of the
2nd Line troops themselves, has yet to be taken into account in any
impression which may be given of the conditions under which training was
carried out. Reference to this factor will be found in the Memorandum
on the Territorial Force written by General Bethune at the War Office,
of which mention has been made before.[41] The then Director-General
remarked: ‘Great difficulty was experienced in training, as, with so
many new Armies to be formed, the majority of capable instructors went
to them, and our 2nd Line Territorial Force had to train themselves as
best they could. The result,’ he added, ‘was extraordinarily good and
surprised anyone who had anything to do with it.’ We shall reach the
element of surprise in due course. Here, for the moment, we are concerned
with the ‘great difficulty’ which was encountered, and more particularly
with those aspects of the difficulty which lay outside the cognizance of
the Territorial Force personnel, or, at any rate, outside their control.
Let us go back to first principles. The idea of a voluntary Army,
despite the wastage of war and the unequal distribution of patriotic
sentiment, or of the capacity to respond to it, was still, late in
1914, a sacred article of British faith. Another accepted article, if
not of faith, at least of British practice, was the enlistment of that
voluntary Army on a County basis. This procedure, which was laid down in
Section IX. (I.) (a) of the Territorial and Reserve Forces Act, followed
a similar provision in the Militia Act of 1882, and, tracing it back
to that source, we discover that its primary cause was ‘to estimate
the extent of the County’s liability in the event of the ballot being
enforced.’[42] The tradition survived the ballot, and the rule of County
enlistment was incorporated, as we have seen, in the organization of the
Territorial Force. This rule worked well enough in peace-time, and might
conceivably have continued to work well if it had been the only rule to
be applied when war broke out on a scale not dreamed of by the authors of
the Act of 1907.[43] But, historically speaking, and without attempting
to judge the issue, it was decided very early in the war to vary that
rule, and to raise recruits for the new Armies on a system which crossed
the method handed down to the Territorial Force by the old Militia and
Volunteers. The Counties were reaped of their best men by a Secretary of
State who knew not Lord Haldane. The first hundred thousand disappeared
into the vast abyss of war from every town and village in the country.
Members of Parliament came down to recruit for Kitchener’s Army, and
forgot, or were not reminded by the Mayor, of the claims of Haldane’s
Force. Bonds of brotherhood in arms, by trades, professions, even by
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account