The White Eagle of PolandBenson, E. F. (Edward Frederic)
History
The White Eagle of Poland
Benson, E. F. (Edward Frederic)
Poland -- History -- German occupation, 1914-1918; Polish question
But apart from these two instances a universal chorus of discontent
went up from every section of Polish politics. M. Roman Dmowski, leader
of the National Democrats, and of the Polish party in the Duma, issued a
manifesto on their behalf, calling attention to these points:--
(i) The Polish Nation is one and indivisible. Its aspirations can
not be content without the reunion of partitioned territory.
(ii) The proposed creation of a Polish state formed only of
occupied territories of a single part of Poland merely confirms the
partition of the country.
(iii) Without making definite pledges as to the rights and
prerogatives of the kingdom, the Central Empires only emphasize its
dependence on them. In return they require the Poles to furnish an
army.
(iv) This army is to be sent into battle to defend a cause which is
not Poland’s, and is subordinated to Germany and Austria.
(v) The military projects of Germany and Austria are disastrous for
Poland.
A large meeting of peasants, usually an unorganized body of opinion, was
held at Lodz, demanding (i.) an immediate constitution for the state;
(ii) the appointment of a King of ancient Polish lineage, who should be
a Catholic, should speak Polish, and be the supreme commander of the
Polish army, to be formed for the defence of the state. In the Duma, as
was natural, the Polish Club, with Harusewicz as spokesman, denounced
the German proclamation, saying that all true Poles repudiated it
entirely. Though German propaganda announced enthusiasm over it among
Poles in Paris, the Poles there, as a matter of fact (largely National
Democrats), passed a resolution condemning it. The Central Committee of
the Polish Socialist party did the same, making specific demands about
the appointment of a Diet, with a view to summoning which a provisional
Government must be appointed, composed of democratic elements. They were
willing to defend Poland against Russia, but Germans and Austrians could
not call them to arms. Peasants in Lublin followed the example of Lodz,
and presented a similar petition to Kuk, the Governor-General, who found
nothing better to say than that he saw with joy that the peasants took
an interest in the building of the state. In the United States an
enormous demonstration was held, representing the four million Poles
there, declaring the proclamation to be a strategic move on the part of
Germany, and protesting (i) against the formation of a Polish army to
help Germany, (ii.) against a pretended Polish government which is
merely an instrument in German hands, and (iii.) against a new partition
of Poland. The Realist party, consisting of landowners, similarly
rejected it, claiming an independent Poland (though in 1914 they had
accepted autonomy under Russia) and declared that the proclamation of a
belligerent cannot constitute a solution of the question. In
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account