The pauper scavengers employed by the metropolitan parishes are
divided into three classes: 1. The in-door paupers, who receive no
wages whatever, their lodging, food, and clothing being considered to
be sufficient remuneration for their labour; 2. The out-door paupers,
who are paid partly in money and partly in kind, and employed in some
cases three days, and in others six days in the week; 3. The unemployed
labourers of the district, who are set to scavenging work by the
parish and paid a regular money-wage—the employment being constant,
and the rate of remuneration varying from 1_s._ 3_d._ to 2_s._ 6_d._ a
day for each of the six days, or from 7_s._ 6_d._ to 15_s._ a week.
The first class of pauper-scavengers, or those who receive nothing for
their labour beyond their lodging, food, and clothing, are treated as
slaves. The labour is compulsory, without inducements for exertion,
and conducted upon the same system which the authorities of the
parish would use for working cattle. One of these scavengers gave the
following account of this degrading labour to Mr. Mayhew:—
"'Street-sweeping,' he said, 'degrades a man, and if a man's poor
he hasn't no call to be degraded. Why can't they set the thieves
and pickpockets to sweep? they could be watched easy enough;
there's always idle fellers as reckons theirselves real gents,
as can be got for watching and sitch easy jobs, for they gets
as much for them as three men's paid for hard work in a week. I
never was in a prison, but I've heerd that people there is better
fed and better cared for than in workusses. What's the meaning of
that, sir, I'd like to know. You can't tell me, but I can tell
you. The workus is made as ugly as it can be, that poor people
may be got to leave it, and chance dying in the street rather.'
[Here the man indulged in a gabbled detail of a series of pauper
grievances which I had a difficulty in diverting or interrupting.
On my asking if the other paupers had the same opinion as to the
street-sweeping as he had, he replied:—] 'To be sure they has;
all them that has sense to have a 'pinion at all has; there's
not two sides to it anyhow. No, I don't want to be kept and do
nothink. I want _proper_ work. And by the rights of it I might
as well be kept with nothink to do as — or —' [parish
officials]. 'Have they nothing to do?' I asked. 'Nothink, but to
make mischief and get what ought to go to the poor. It's salaries
and such like as swallers the rates, and that's what every poor
family knows as knows any think. Did I ever like my work better?
Certainly not. Do I take any pains with it? Well, where would be
the good? I can sweep well enough, when I please, but if I could
do more than the best man as ever Mr. Drake paid a pound a week
to, it wouldn't be a bit better for me—not a bit, sir, I assure
you.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account