"However fascinating to Americans may be the luxury,
conversational freedom, and high intellectual cultivation of
English society, they cannot fail to be disgusted with the
aristocratic insolence which is the vice of the whole. The
puerile and barbaric spirit of contempt is scarcely known in
America; the English insolence of class to class, of individuals
toward each other, is not even conceived of, except in the one
highly disgraceful instance of the treatment of people of colour.
Nothing in American civilization struck me so forcibly and so
pleasurably as the invariable respect paid to man, as man.
Nothing since my return to England has given me so much pain as
the contrast there. Perhaps no Englishman can become fully aware,
without going to America, of the atmosphere of insolence in
which he dwells; of the taint of contempt which infects all the
intercourses of his world. He cannot imagine how all he can say
that is truest and best about the treatment of people of colour
in America, is neutralized on the spot by its being understood
how the same contempt is spread over the whole of society here,
which is there concentrated upon the blacks."
It has been remarked that those who are most submissive as serfs are
the most arrogant and tyrannical as lords. In Great Britain, from dukes
down to workhouse officials, the truth of this remark is obvious. Each
class treats its superior with abject deference, and its inferior
with overbearing insolence. The corollary of our quotation from Miss
Martineau is that the treatment masters give to their negro slaves in
America, in their common intercourse, is what masters give to their
servants in Great Britain. In the free States of America a master may
command his servant, and if obedience is refused he may deduct from
his wages or give him a discharge, but the laws prevent all violence;
the man is never forgotten in the servant. Another state of affairs
is to be found in Great Britain. The laws are inadequate in their
construction and too costly in their administration to protect the poor
servant. Should he refuse obedience, or irritate his master in any way,
his punishment is just as likely to be kicks and blows as a discharge
or a reduction of wages. Englishmen have frequently complained, while
doing business in the United States, because they were prevented from
striking refractory persons in their employ. In attempting to act out
their tyrannical ideas, such employers have been severely chastised by
their free, republican servants.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account