"That one of the most frequent causes of accidents in these mines
is the want of superintendence by overlookers or otherwise,
to see to the security of the machinery for letting down and
bringing up the work-people, the restriction of the number of
persons that ascend and descend at a time, the state of the
mine as to the quantity of noxious gas in it, the efficiency of
the ventilation, the exactness with which the air-door keepers
perform their duty, the places into which it is safe or unsafe to
go with a naked lighted candle, the security of the proppings to
uphold the roof, &c.
"That another frequent cause of fatal accidents is the almost
universal practice of intrusting the closing of the air-doors to
very young children.
"That there are many mines in which the most ordinary precautions
to guard against accidents are neglected, and in which no money
appears to be expended with a view to secure the safety, much
less the comfort, of the work-people.
"There are, moreover, two practices, peculiar to a few districts,
which deserve the highest reprobation, namely,—first, the
practice, not unknown in some of the smaller mines in Yorkshire,
and common in Lancashire, in employing ropes that are unsafe
for letting down and drawing up the work-people; and second,
the practice occasionally met with in Yorkshire, and common in
Derbyshire and Lancashire, of employing boys at the steam-engines
for letting down and drawing up the work-people."—_First Report,
Conclusions_, p. 255-257.
Well, what did the British Government do when the heart-rending report
of the commissioners was received? It felt the necessity of a show of
legislative interference. Lord Ashley introduced a bill into the House
of Commons, having for its object the amelioration of the condition
of the mining women and children. Much discussion occurred. The bill
passed the House of Commons, and was taken to the House of Lords, the
high court of British oppression. Some lords advocated the measure,
whereupon Lord Londonderry and some others spoke of them as "bitten
with a humanity mania." Modifications were made in the bill to suit
the pockets of the luxurious proprietors, and then it was grumblingly
adopted. What did the bill provide? That no child under _ten_ years of
age, and no woman or girl, of any age, should be allowed to work in a
mine. Now, children may be ten years of age, and above that, and yet
they are still tender little creatures. The majority of the sufferers
who came to the notice of the commissioners were above ten years of
age! In that point, at least, the bill was worse than a nullity—it was
a base deceit, pouring balm, but not upon the wound!
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account