“I’m not talking of him,” said Wilkins with careless cruelty. “He’s restrained. I mean the really imaginative people, the people with vision, the people who let themselves go. You see now why they are rotten, why they must be rotten. (No! No! take it away. I’m talking.) I feel so strongly about this, about the natural and necessary disreputableness of everybody who produces reputable writing—and for the matter of that, art generally—that I set my face steadily against all these attempts that keep on cropping up to make Figures of us. We aren’t Figures, Lady Harman; it isn’t our line. Of all the detestable aspects of the Victorian period surely that disposition to make Figures of its artists and literary men was the most detestable. Respectable Figures—Examples to the young. The suppressions, the coverings up that had to go on, the white-washing of Dickens,—who was more than a bit of a rip, you know, the concealment of Thackeray’s mistresses. Did you know he had mistresses? Oh rather! And so on. It’s like that bust of Jove—or Bacchus was it?—they pass off as Plato, who probably looked like any other literary Grub. That’s why I won’t have anything to do with these Academic developments that my friend Brumley—Do you know him by the way?—goes in for. He’s the third man down——You _do_ know him. And he’s giving up the Academic Committee, is he? I’m glad he’s seen it at last. What _is_ the good of trying to have an Academy and all that, and put us in uniform and make out we are Somebodies, and respectable enough to be shaken hands with by George and Mary, when as a matter of fact we are, by our very nature, a collection of miscellaneous scandals——We _must_ be. Bacon, Shakespear, Byron, Shelley—all the stars.... No, Johnson wasn’t a star, he was a character by Boswell.... Oh! great things come out of us, no doubt, our arts are the vehicles of wonder and hope, the world is dead without these things we produce, but that’s no reason why—why the mushroom-bed should follow the mushrooms into the soup, is it? Perfectly fair image. (No, take it away.)” He paused and then jumped in again as she was on the point of speaking. “And you see even if our temperaments didn’t lead inevitably to our—dipping rather, we should still have to—_dip_. Asking a writer or a poet to be seemly and Academic and so on, is like asking an eminent surgeon to be stringently decent. It’s—you see, it’s incompatible. Now a king or a butler or a family solicitor—if you like.” He paused again. Lady Harman had been following him with an attentive reluctance. “But what are we to do,” she asked, “we people who are puzzled by life, who want guidance and ideas and—help, if—if all the people we look to for ideas are——” “Bad characters.” “Well,—it’s your theory, you know—bad characters?”