The Wife of Sir Isaac HarmanWells, H. G. (Herbert George)
General
The Wife of Sir Isaac Harman
Wells, H. G. (Herbert George)
England -- Fiction; Upper class -- Fiction; Women's rights -- Fiction
With that as Snagsby afterwards put it—for the battle raged so fiercely
as to go on even when he presently returned to the room—“the fat was in
the fire.” The Harman breakfast-table was caught up into the Great
Controversy with heat and fury like a tree that is overtaken by a
forest fire. It burnt for weeks, and smouldered still when the first
white heats had abated. I will not record the arguments of either side,
they were abominably bad and you have heard them all time after time; I
do not think that whatever side you have taken in this matter you would
find much to please you in Sir Isaac’s goadings or Georgina’s
repartees. Sir Isaac would ask if women were prepared to go as soldiers
and Georgina would enquire how many years of service he had done or
horrify her mother by manifest allusion to the agonies and dangers of
maternity,—things like that. It gave a new interest to breakfast for
Snagsby; and the peculiarly lady-like qualities of Mrs. Sawbridge, a
gift for silent, pallid stiffness, a disposition, tactful but
unsuccessful, to “change the subject,” an air of being about to leave
the room in disdain, had never shone with such baleful splendour. Our
interest here is rather with the effect of these remarkable disputes,
which echoed in Sir Isaac’s private talk long after Georgina had gone
again, upon Lady Harman. He could not leave this topic of feminine
emancipation alone, once it had been set going, and though Ellen would
always preface her remarks by, “Of course Georgina goes too far,” he
worried her slowly into a series of definite insurgent positions. Sir
Isaac’s attacks on Georgina certainly brought out a good deal of
absurdity in her positions, and Georgina at times left Sir Isaac
without a leg to stand on, and the net result of their disputes as of
most human controversies was not conviction for the hearer but release.
Her mind escaped between them, and went exploring for itself through
the great gaps they had made in the simple obedient assumptions of her
girlhood. That question originally put in Paradise, “Why shouldn’t we?”
came into her mind and stayed there. It is a question that marks a
definite stage in the departure from innocence. Things that had seemed
opaque and immutable appeared translucent and questionable. She began
to read more and more in order to learn things and get a light upon
things, and less and less to pass the time. Ideas came to her that
seemed at first strange altogether and then grotesquely justifiable and
then crept to a sort of acceptance by familiarity. And a disturbing
intermittent sense of a general responsibility increased and increased
in her.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account