The Wild IrishmanCrosland, T. W. H. (Thomas William Hodgson)
History
The Wild Irishman
Crosland, T. W. H. (Thomas William Hodgson)
National characteristics, Irish
I suppose that next to the Scotch, the Irish are out and out the dirtiest
people on the earth. But whereas Scotch dirt is a crude and gross affair,
Irish dirt has still a pathetic and almost tender grace about it. “Dear,
dirty Dublin” sigh the emotional in such matters—though you never catch
anybody shedding a tear for remembrance of dear, filthy Glasgow. Dublin
is indubitably a dirty city, just as Ireland is a dirty country, and for
Irishmen, at any rate, the Government is a dirty Government. And it is
not because Dublin or Ireland is dirty of necessity, or in the way that
the Black Country or the East End of London are dirty. Not a bit of it:
Dublin and Ireland are dirty simply and solely because the Dublin and
Irish people steadfastly refuse to keep them clean. To all intents and
purposes the Irish people have lost, if indeed they ever possessed, that
gift of punctilious domesticity, which insists first and last and always
on cleanliness. In Dublin you will come upon more dirty hotels and more
dirty houses than in pretty well any other city of its size in Europe.
True, the dirt has the merit of not being too obvious, and falling short
of the scandalous; but it is still there, and you cannot get away from
it. Properly looked into, it recommends itself to you as the dirt of a
happy-go-lucky, neglectful, behind-hand and poverty-stricken people,
rather than of a people who are flagrantly given over to dirt for its
own sake. It is the dirt of the slattern who is forever dusting things
with her apron, rather than of the stout idleback for whom dust and grime
and sloppiness have no terrors, and no reproach. It is a dirt which is
the direct consequence of bad seasons, the decay of trade, monetary
stringency, and public and private listlessness and apathy. It is the
kind of dirt which one associates with the boarding-houses of elderly
ladies who have seen “better days.” Ireland’s better days have been few
and far between, and they would seem to be all past. Hence, no doubt, the
dustiness and dinginess and shabby gentility of her parlors. In an Irish
hotel dirt and its common concomitant, tumbledownness, are ever before
you. The floors clamor to be swept, the furniture would give a day of its
life for a polishing, the wall papers are faded and fly-blown, there are
cobwebs in the top corners and dust in the bottom corners, the windows
are rickety and perfunctorily cleaned, the carpets infirm and old, the
linen worn and yellow with age, the crockery cracked and chipped, the
cutlery dull and greasy, and the general air of the place shabby and
forlorn. I do not say that there are no cleanly and spick-and-span hotels
in Dublin; for there is at least one such establishment. But, in the
main, what one may term the semi-clean, semi-dirty, used-to-be kind of
hotel prevails. Even the waiters, though their hair be greased and their
faces shine by virtue of vigorous applications of soap, wear frayed and
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account