The will to live (Les Roquevillard) : $b A novelBordeaux, Henry
General
The will to live (Les Roquevillard) : $b A novel
Bordeaux, Henry
Elopement -- Fiction; Families -- Fiction; France -- Fiction; French fiction -- Translations into English
_You cannot surely be aware of what happened immediately after
your departure: otherwise you would not have kept still so long and
brought such sorrow on us. Mr. Frasne entered against you, yes, you,
Maurice, a complaint of abuse of confidence. That’s what it is called:
I’ve heard it talked about so much. He accused you of having stolen
one hundred thousand francs from his safe. He brought a civil suit
to bring about your extradition, and since you did not appear you
were adjudged guilty by default. I’m explaining it to you with the
words I have heard used. The council did not want to condemn you.
But the clerks in the office, especially Mr. Philippeaux, testified
against you at the hearing. They declared that you were aware the safe
contained all that money, and that you stayed the last of all of them
in the office, and had the keys, and that you knew the combination
that would open it. And so the verdict was against you, though with
extenuating circumstances, and they sentenced you to a year in prison.
It seems that is the minimum. They took account of the influences you
had come under. But they sentenced you, you understand. That was last
month. Mamma was no longer here. When father told the news to me his
face was so white that I was afraid for him. He controlled himself, as
always. I should have preferred to see him weep. But he isn’t one of
the kind that weep. He suffers inside, and that’s worse._
_The judgment was posted on our door, published in the papers.
It seems that is the law. All the old Roquevillards that have done
so many services for their country could not shield us from this
flaunting of our name._
_There are also the one hundred thousand francs which you must
restore to Mr. Frasne. Father is of a mind to sell La Vigie to pay
them back. He says the length of your absence proves, unfortunately,
that you must have used the money, which, from the point of view of
honour, is the same as theft. Charles, on the other hand, argues that
to pay the money is to admit that you are guilty, and that no such
admission ought to be made at such a price. But he has not the family
honour in his charge, and I for my part am with father. At all events,
the court has decreed a sequestration to divide our mother’s fortune
and obtain your part. From my own, since I am of age, father gave me
the sum I am sending you, when I asked him for it. He appeared very
much surprised. I don’t know if he suspects. I offered to show him
your letter, but he refused to read it, with these words, which I copy
down for you:_
“_No, he is dead to me, unless he comes back to prove his
innocence._”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account