[184] Mr. Savage says that Mr. Hollingworth's Name was _Richard_. Beale, though apparently much wanting in Sense, may be supposed to have known the given Name of a prominent Man like Hollingworth, with whom he was probably well acquainted. It seems however, that Beale confounded the Name of the Son with that of the Father. The Hollingworth Family came to Salem in 1635. The Name is often since spelt _Hollingsworth_. See _Founders of N. Eng._ P. 40. [185] For some Account of him, consult the _History of the Reed Family_, by J. W. Reed, Esq. published 1861, Page 42. [186] In the _N. Eng. Hist. and Gen. Reg._ Vol. VI, Page 316, some Account of this Individual will be found. [187] A brief and garbled Extract is among the Records, not dated, but placed after the "29th of March, 169½"! [188] The Papers inserted in the Records previous to this are, of course, out of place, as they are of a later Date. A Rearrangement, or Recompilation of the Witchcraft Papers must at sometime be made. [189] There was a large Family of _Clarks_ early at Haverhill. To what Family this injured Woman belonged, my Materials do not disclose. [190] In 1687, Joseph Peasely was chosen Constable, but there is no certainty that he exercised the Office in 1692. John Ayer, Jr., shared the Duties. See Chase, _Hist. Haverhill_, 145. [191] Like the Clarks, the _Swan_ Family was extensive at Haverhill; but Mr. Chase did not find a Timothy. [192] Perhaps Mr. Hezekiah, of Boston. It may be he to whom Mr. Calef refers in his _Postscript_. See Page 154, _original paging_. [193] I do not find the Name of Post in Mr. Chase's _Haverhill_. There was a Family at Woburn; and, according to Mr. Savage, John Post, of that Town, had by Wife Mary Tyler, a Daughter Mary, born 1664, who may have been this Witness. [194] The same who has been so often mentioned as Elizabeth Hubbard. In the next Article of this Appendix she is particularly noticed. [195] Mr. Fowler has very kindly placed this highly valuable Article at the Editor's Disposal. It was originally read before the _Essex Inst't._ [196] Being the Same contained in Mr. Calef's Part Third, are omitted here. See Vol. II, P. 140-3; or Pages 55-7, original Edition. [197] See Vol. II, P. 143-8, where this Paper is given entire. NOTE BY THE EDITOR. WHEN this Edition of the _More Wonders_ had passed through the Press, the Publisher brought in the following ERRATA, which, it seems, had been inserted in some Copies of the original Edition; and, although several of the Errors are quite immaterial, and others have been corrected in the Process of Revision, yet it was thought best to insert it here entire.