The amaternal assertion, that motherliness can be no higher than justice
and truth, is an infuriating antithesis. It is as if one should assert
that “air is better than water, or both better than bread.” Both
assertions place the fundamental condition of life counter to other
needs of life! Who shall exercise justice and truth when no new men are
born? And, moreover, how shall justice and truth increase in mankind if
children are not trained to a greater reverence for justice and a deeper
love of truth? In order to fulfil this one office _of education_ well,
mothers need their _universal human culture in its entirety_. But even
if this were not so, if motherhood did not require the concentration of
woman’s personality; even if motherliness remained only “primitive
instinct,” yet this instinct, in the women who have guarded it, is more
valuable for mankind than the universal human development of power of
the women who have lost this instinct. No social nor individual activity
of women could compensate for the extinction of this “instinct,” which
only recently in Messina drove hundreds of mothers to shield their
children with their own bodies; this “instinct,” which recently impelled
a mother, who learned before she gave birth to her child that her own
life must be the price for the saving of that of the child, to cry: “I
have lived, but the life of my child belongs now to mankind—save the
child!” So the mother died without even having seen the beautiful being
for whom she gave her life. In the world of “personally” developed
women, however, after a new Messina catastrophe the mothers would be
found with their manuscripts and their pictures in their arms. And
confronted with a choice like that related above, the mother would
answer: “Let the child die, I will live my personal life to the end.”
The amaternal type must persist for the present. There are in reality in
our time many women who with unresponsive eyes can pass by a lovely
child, among them even mothers who do not feel the pure sensuousness,
the wise madness, the intoxicating delight which such a child awakens in
every motherly woman; mothers who have no conception what a fascinating
subject for study the soul of a child can offer. Jean Paul, who scourged
worthless mothers and tried to awaken the repressed maternal instinct of
his time with the charge that a woman who is bored when she has
children, is a contemptible creature, would find to-day many mothers who
are bored only if they have their children about them.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account