That sound men abominate this tendency is justifiable. On the other
hand, it is unwarrantable to confuse a variation of feminism with the
woman movement in its entirety, a movement which includes in itself a
great earnest desire to work for the welfare of both mothers and
children. As a manifestation of womanliness in its most complete,
perfect form, many men still elect the woman whose entire life-content
consists in the cult of her own beauty, a cult whose attendant
phenomenon is the æsthetic culture which raises the temple about the
altar. Under this perfect and apparently inspired form there is,
however, rarely anything to be found of that which the man seeks: the
longing and the power of true womanhood to give happiness by erotic and
motherly devotion. Such women, like those cerebral women engrossed by
their studies and their work, allow a real love to pass them by; men are
only sacrificial servants of the cult, and the high priest is chosen not
upon the ground of motives of feeling. This type is said to be more
common in America than in Europe. But it existed thousands of years ago
on the Tiber as well as on the Nile. That Cleopatra in the language of
feminism now speaks of the “right of the personality,” and means thereby
her right to represent no other value in life than that of the white
peacock and the black orchid—the value of rarity—that does not make her
a “product of the woman movement.”
But certain men characterise a woman thus, if they have been deceived in
her: a psychology which equals in value that of the feminist when she
speaks of man as the “oppressor,” the “corrupter,”—without noting that
the world is full of poor men corrupted or tormented by women! Amid such
mutual accusations, just or unjust—whereby _gifted_ men maintain
generalisations about “woman’s” being which are quite as ingenuous as
those which _silly_ women propose about “man’s” being—the sexes, in the
days of the woman movement, have been almost as much alienated from each
other as drawn together. The estrangement has taken place in the erotic
field and through labour competition; the reconciliation has been
effected—leaving out coëducation—by common industry and the social
activity of both sexes.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account