The women of the Renaissance : $b A study of feminismMaulde-La-Clavière, R. de (René)
History
The women of the Renaissance : $b A study of feminism
Maulde-La-Clavière, R. de (René)
Feminism -- France -- History; Feminism -- Italy -- History; Renaissance; Women -- History -- Renaissance, 1450-1600
The truth is that, one way or another, a very large number of women no
longer suffered themselves to be snuffed out, “trodden under foot,” to
use the current phrase. As to the manner in which their controlling
influence showed itself, that depended on events, tastes, how the wind
blew, circumstances. A favourite idea of Margaret of France, and
one which it would have been difficult to get out of her head, was
that women always err by their meek and quiet spirit, their excess of
long-suffering. In vain is the reply made that more than one woman
makes a virtue of necessity, and that, face to face with a violent
creature threatening to break every bone in her body, a woman needs all
her patience; Margaret protests that she would rather be flogged than
despised. This magnificent declaration sets some of the company smiling,
and enraptures the women. One pert widow alleges that she loved her
husband so much that if he had beaten her she would have killed him. “In
other words,” retorts Henri d’Albret, “you mean to rule the roost. Well,
I am agreeable, but you would have to get all the husbands to agree.”
Margaret winces under this intellectual cut; she is put out, for natural
as she would regard it for her husband to take her orders, she dares not
say so. Even she falters, and admits that the man is the natural head,
but not that he has a right to desert or maltreat his wife.[110] Can this
be Margaret? Yes, the words are her own, and are exactly to the point.
Women do lack decision—and she was the very first to show it!
Some young ladies, to elude this difficulty, thought it well to marry
a ninny—if not an absolute fool. Worthy folk were amazed and sang the
praises of mind and its attractions, “the treasures of knowledge,” and
asked them what pleasure they promised themselves. What a question to
ask! Why, since a husband was in question, they promised themselves
precisely no pleasure; nothing but money, or a name! That was how
the Duchess of Medina-Sidonia married; she espoused an income of
sixty-thousand ducats, with a grandee of Spain. True, this grandee,
when paying a visit to the archbishop, asked very politely to see the
children! There was nothing here to hinder the duchess from having as
much mind as she wanted. But it must be confessed that this was an
extreme remedy, and it would be preferable for a woman to feel and
believe herself able to mate with a man of intelligence.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account