The women of the Renaissance : $b A study of feminismMaulde-La-Clavière, R. de (René)
History
The women of the Renaissance : $b A study of feminism
Maulde-La-Clavière, R. de (René)
Feminism -- France -- History; Feminism -- Italy -- History; Renaissance; Women -- History -- Renaissance, 1450-1600
Gold and pleasure were the deities to whom we owe the charming eighteenth
century. But they lead to revolutions. This fact came out clearly, too
clearly in fact, in Italy, and compelled men to endeavour to restrain
these two great world forces within wholesome limits. In the fifteenth
century Christian socialism reared its head high at Florence and Rome,
and under stress of its menaces a science of philosophy came to birth.
In presence of this social peril, certain men, compelled to issue
from their egotism, pointed out the road for timid women to follow
to avoid vengeful reprisals. Men of affairs, bankers, notaries and
others banded themselves together with the firm resolution of forgoing
business, interests, ambitions, even their for the most part despotic
hopes in state intervention, of seeking to practise self-devotion, and
of borrowing, if necessary, something of the idealism of philosophers
and artists, so that they might give a practical sanction to their high
station by working to raise others. The Florentine people swallowed
the bait; at once ardent and refined, they admirably blended practical
reasoning with ideal aspirations. And so the first step was taken.
However, it was more particularly at Rome that this idea, still
rudimentary and ill-defined, of purifying life and pursuing social
happiness by means of the tender charm of the Beautiful made progress.
It found there a well-prepared soil. Intellectual culture and elegance
of speech did not represent at Rome, as they did elsewhere, a mere
ornamentation, they were the very substance of the state. Money was
intellectualised as regards its origin and its end, and nowhere had men
a better conception of an oligarchical society, a republic regulated by
absolute power. The heads of the church formed a unique world of their
own, as little tainted by the military or frivolous character with
which certain aristocracies were reproached as by the taste for coarse
pleasures natural to some self-made men. They showed indeed a living
example of a true aristocracy, in the exact signification of the word,
that is to say, a body of men of varied degrees of rank, raised high
above the common run of men by some eminent gift—some by high political
position or distinguished birth, others by a large fortune, others by
great accomplishments, renowned virtue, profound learning, striking
talents. They abhorred cliques and their pettinesses; to greatness
of position should correspond greatness of ideas. And this splendid
aristocracy, thus composed of the choice flower of society, delighted
in tracing its descent from remote ancestors. It set no store either on
high ancestry (though some were of brilliant descent), or on a display
of wealth (though some had enormous fortunes); it ventured to connect
itself with all the most illustrious and conspicuous names in the past
history of the human race from the time of the Greeks and Romans: Plato,
Socrates, Archimedes, and Cicero were its ancestors.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account