The women of the Renaissance : $b A study of feminismMaulde-La-Clavière, R. de (René)
History
The women of the Renaissance : $b A study of feminism
Maulde-La-Clavière, R. de (René)
Feminism -- France -- History; Feminism -- Italy -- History; Renaissance; Women -- History -- Renaissance, 1450-1600
What she was losing hope of, a fraction of the clergy set themselves
to win. There was, among the mass of cassocked peasants and rochetted
aristocrats, a small group of cultivated men drawing its inspiration from
the Cardinal of Amboise,[133] less audacious than Rome, less retrograde
than Germany. These recognised the traditional merits of military glory,
birth, and money, but would have liked to reconcile them with the newer
virtues, blend them together into one radiance, homogeneous like the
sunbeam, which is composed of colours so various; they would have liked
to see all these glories combining, as at Rome, into one rainbow-like
effulgence. A monk of Cluny, Clichtoue, begs, beseeches well-born young
men to shun the enervating paths of infatuation, idleness and vice. He
has endless examples showing the possibility of alliance between literary
tastes[134] and the military life; he reveres the principles of rank
so highly as to discern them in application everywhere, even among the
metals; but he longs ardently to bind into one sheaf all the vital
forces of society; he is a philosopher, one may even say a sort of John
the Baptist. He proclaims Plato; he is more scriptural than Luther, and
has as much antique culture as any Roman prelate;[135] to him the future
seems to outline itself clearly. “After virtue,” he says, “a noble can
have no comelier ornament than letters. Philosophy is not the recipient,
but the source of nobility.” He adjures distinguished men to pay real
attention to the social obligations incumbent on them, under penalty of
losing their rank. He does not disavow the natural pleasure a man takes
in the thought that he has had ancestors and will have descendants, but
to him this does not seem a sufficient though an honourable aim in life.
If no means are found of uniting the two nobilities, that of the body and
that of the mind, no doubt (in his opinion) the nobility of the mind will
get the upper hand; Solomon, who is not generally considered a modern or
even a socialist, had already said so long ago: “I myself also am mortal,
like to other men, and am sprung from the terrestrial lineage of the
first man. And in the womb of a mother was I moulded into flesh. And I
also, when I was born, drew in the common air and fell upon the kindred
earth, uttering, like all men, for my first voice the self-same wail: in
swaddling clothes was I nursed, and with watchful cares. Who among the
kings had any other beginning? All men have one entrance into life, and a
like departure.”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account