The women of the Renaissance : $b A study of feminismMaulde-La-Clavière, R. de (René)
History
The women of the Renaissance : $b A study of feminism
Maulde-La-Clavière, R. de (René)
Feminism -- France -- History; Feminism -- Italy -- History; Renaissance; Women -- History -- Renaissance, 1450-1600
Then comes philosophy to preside at their feasts with salutary effect.
It teaches men that dining is a spiritual function. The table becomes
idealised. Much thought is devoted to its decorations, to regaling the
eyes with the sight of beautiful birds in their charming many-hued
plumage—peacocks, storks, or small and pretty birds strung on skewers.
The mistress of the house shows her art in having the daintiest courses
served on gold and crystal—things which while tickling the palate
content the mind; first dessert, composed of fruits and sweetmeats, then
compounds of eggs or fish, light dishes, in which pistachios, pepper,
ginger, rosemary, thyme, peppermint—everything that has sweetness or
aroma insinuates itself and figures in manifold combinations. Just as in
Plato’s _Symposium_, people take their places at table not to eat but
to talk, because conversation can have no warmer, more cheerful, more
restful setting. Often in the platonist system some incomparable lady
presided, and everything centred in her; from her eyes “rained love,”
that is, in the words of the guests, “meat and drink, ambrosia and
nectar.” She set the pitch; there was a cross-fire of witticisms flashing
over the table like fireworks, or else wit fluttered lightly about amid
a subdued hum of laughter. With one consent these were voted delightful
hours. Men fuddled themselves with talk: “’Tis my greatest vice,”
confesses Erasmus.
This art became so well acclimatised at the court of Francis I. that it
soon became the joy of France. Margaret of France writes enthusiastically
about those dinners at which they used to “fill themselves with words
more than with meat.” French wit, which always owes a little to good
cheer, sparkled quite naturally.
In Italy they were at fault in using aesthetic means too freely to
support the dinner. They durst not trust simply to conversation, but
employed music, a proceeding which appeared rank heresy in France. King
Alfonso of Naples, indeed, long regarded as the pastmaster of good
living, complicated his dinners with all sorts of refinements; after the
first courses, the ears were enchanted with harmonies soft as the breeze
of Capri blowing over the sparkling, rippling sea; or else there were
mimes, the _pulcinella_,[201] and roars of laughter. Then his guests
returned to the table and remained till the moment when, their heads
swimming with the strong and generous fumes of Falernian, they removed
the plate and withdrew.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account