The women of the Renaissance : $b A study of feminismMaulde-La-Clavière, R. de (René)
History
The women of the Renaissance : $b A study of feminism
Maulde-La-Clavière, R. de (René)
Feminism -- France -- History; Feminism -- Italy -- History; Renaissance; Women -- History -- Renaissance, 1450-1600
On the other hand, the married woman, no matter to what lengths her
husband might carry his ill-usage, knew well that there was no redress
for her anywhere. Unhappy wives sometimes in the madness of despair fled
from their homes in the most shocking plight, only to be remorselessly
dragged back by their father, brother, or cousins, as a result of the
appalling freemasonry between men. To rely on her own mother was out of
the question for a wife; the two women belonged to two distinct houses,
with a barrier, a great gulf fixed between them. In the early days of
wedlock a husband, not to appear a tyrant, and because he was in no way
inconvenienced, would allow his wife now and then to visit her mother;
but he contrived that these visits became gradually rarer, and when he
was not at home, a wife careful of her repose and dignity would never
cross her mother’s threshold without first writing to him: “If it be your
good pleasure, I would fain go.”
That was a woman’s life. As it was not all smiles and rosewater, there
was good reason for marrying the girls off early, before they had learned
to care one way or another, their equipment being a few simple maxims
inculcating obedience, and some odds and ends of medical knowledge. Wives
who owed their training to Vivès could not but be very unhappy, according
to the principles of marriage held by Vivès himself. For Vivès not merely
approved of early marriages, he was also one of those who believed that
the wife was created for the husband, and an irresponsible and inferior
being; he looked at the husband as someone to bring her out. Erasmus,
Bouchet, Dolce himself, nay, everybody had much the same impression.
The supremacy of the husband was the sacred ark; bold indeed would be
the person who dared lift a hand to it! So in modern times we have seen
aesthetes, like Ruskin, capable of every possible audacity but that.
Ruskin does not understand women, and yet he has gone out of his way to
exalt their rôle in the world; but, as soon as he comes face to face with
the husband, he loses countenance, his candour vanishes, his words become
cold and colourless.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account