If the rays of light are not parallel, as in the case of the source of
light being near the lens, they do not converge so rapidly as when they
proceed from a distant object, consequently the focus for near objects
is longer in proportion to their distance. In fig. 29 for instance, if a
candle be placed as shown, and a screen on the other side of the lens, a
point will be found where the image of the candle is seen upon it in a
reversed position. The distance between these two points is always
relative, and they are called conjugate foci. Thus, the candle may
change places with the screen with a similar effect, as long as the
exact position of the two points is preserved. If the candle is placed
farther off, we must diminish the distance between the screen and the
lens, and _vice versâ_. In fact, the nearer the object, the longer the
focus; the farther it is off, the shorter the focus. Half an hour’s
experiment with a double convex lens, a piece of white cardboard, and a
small candle, will teach the student more about the properties of convex
lenses than a chapter of explanation. A common magnifying-glass, or even
an old spectacle lens, will serve the purpose of more expensive
instruments.
[Illustration:
FIG. 30.—Conjugate Foci.
]
We now proceed to speak of the images formed by lenses. In fig. 31 we
have a flower placed on one side of a lens. As it is not at an infinite
distance, the rays sent out by its various parts are convergent, and not
parallel, consequently they do not meet at the sidereal focus, but at a
point beyond it, according to the rule already laid down. The rays
proceeding from the exact centre of the flower striking the lens exactly
in the middle at right angles, suffer no change, the others being
refracted in proportion to their angles of incidence.
[Illustration:
FIG. 31.—Images formed by Convex Lenses.
]
The rays proceeding from the flower cross each other at a certain point:
hence the image on the screen is reversed. The dimensions of the image
will depend on the distance of the object from the lens. This is a fact
we meet with every day, when using an opera-glass or a telescope. Images
formed by convex lenses upon a screen are called by opticians _real
images_, in contradistinction to those which are the result of mere
reflection, as in the case of plane mirrors. These latter are known as
_virtual images_ and are produced by convex lenses as well as by plain
reflecting surfaces. In fig. 32, for instance, the unreversed image of
the insect seen by the eye is not a real image, but a virtual one,—a
fact that might be easily proved by placing a screen in the position of
the eye, when it would be found that no image would be formed.
When using an ordinary magnifying-glass we see the virtual image of the
object we are looking at, but in the case of a telescope or opera-glass
we see the real image of the object, formed by the large lens in front,
and reversed again by the arrangement of small lenses next to the eye.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account