_The Dutch Lover_ was produced at the Duke’s Theatre, Dorset Garden, in
February, 1673, but owing to the manifold disadvantages under which it
was put on the stage it did not meet with that success it certainly
deserved. It was indeed, to quote the preface, ‘hugely injured in the
acting.’ The performers were anything but word perfect and hopelessly
forgot or confused their business, which, more especially in a play of
such a type as this romantic comedy so full of busy and complicated
detail demanding close and continuous attention, was enough to mystify
the 220 audience completely and foredoom the piece to failure. The
worst sinner was Haunce himself, who hardly spoke one of his lines but
gagged from start to finish. Not unnaturally, Mrs. Behn resented this
and avows that she would have trounced him roundly in print except ‘de
mortuis...’ Although the original cast is not given, this detail
enables us to fix the representative of Haunce as Angel, a leading
comedian, who died in the spring of 1673, his name last appearing as de
Boastado in Ravenscroft’s _Careless Lovers_.
In addition to these serious detriments the costumes were very poor,
especially the disguise of Alonzo as the Hollander, and Haunce’s own
‘fantastical travelling habit,’ dresses on the aptness of which the
probability of the intrigue can be made so largely to depend.
Yet another mishap occurred. The epilogue, which had been promised by a
friend, did not come to hand, and accordingly the present epilogue was
hastily composed. Though containing nothing notably witty or pointed it
does not fall below the generality of these productions. Of the
prologue we have no means of judging as it was unfortunately lost
before it could find its way into print.
Had _The Dutch Lover_ received fair treatment from the actors it should
surely have commanded no small success in its day. Technically it is
well contrived, and exhibits the skill and clever stage-craft of its
authoress in a high degree, qualities which have often given a long
lease of life to plays of infinitely less merit.
221
AN EPISTLE TO THE READER.
Good, Sweet, Honey, Sugar-Candied Reader,
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account