The Works of Daniel Webster, Volume 1Webster, Daniel
History
The Works of Daniel Webster, Volume 1
Webster, Daniel
United States -- Politics and government -- 1815-1861
Election to Congress from Boston.--State of Parties.--Meeting of the
Eighteenth Congress.--Mr. Webster's Resolution and Speech in favor
of the Greeks.--Argument in the Supreme Court in the Case of Gibbons
and Ogden.--Circumstances under which it was made.--Speech on the
Tariff Law of 1824.--A complete Revision of the Law for the
Punishment of Crimes against the United States reported by Mr.
Webster, and enacted.--The Election of Mr. Adams as President of the
United States.--Meeting of the Nineteenth Congress, and State of
Parties.--Congress of Panama, and Mr. Webster's Speech on that
Subject.--Election as a Senator of the United States.--Revision of
the Tariff Law by the Twentieth Congress.--Embarrassments of the
Question.--Mr. Webster's Course and Speech on this Subject.
In the autumn of 1822, Mr. Webster consented to be a candidate for
Congress for the city (then town) of Boston, and was chosen by a very
large majority over his opponent, Mr. Jesse Putnam. The former party
distinctions, as has been already observed, had nearly lost their
significance in Massachusetts, as in some other parts of the country.
As a necessary, or at least a natural consequence of this state of
things, four candidates had already been brought forward for the
Presidential election of November, 1824; namely, Mr. John Quincy Adams
of Massachusetts, Mr. Clay of Kentucky, General Jackson of Tennessee,
and Mr. Crawford of Georgia. Mr. Calhoun of South Carolina and Mr.
Lowndes of the same State had also both been nominated by their
friends at an early period of the canvass; but the latter was soon
removed by death, and Mr. Calhoun withdrew his pretensions in favor of
General Jackson. All the candidates named had either originally belonged
to the old Democratic party (or Republican party as it was then more
usually called), or had for many years attached themselves to it; but
no one of them was supported on that ground. Mr. Crawford alone had
attempted to avail himself of the ancient party machinery, so far as to
accept a nomination by a Congressional caucus of his friends. They
formed, however, but a minority of the Republican members of Congress,
and the signal failure of the nomination contributed to the final
abandonment of that mode of procedure. No Presidential candidate has
since been nominated by a Congressional caucus. In the canvass of
1824, it was the main effort of the friends of all the candidates, by
holding out the prospect of a liberal basis of administration, to draw
to themselves as many as possible of the old Federal party. In
Massachusetts, and generally in New England, the fusion of parties was
complete, and Mr. Adams received their united support. In the Middle
States the union was less perfect, and the votes of a large proportion
of the old Federal party were given to General Jackson and Mr.
Crawford.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account