The works of Francis Maitland Balfour, Volume 1 (of 4) : $b Separate memoirsBalfour, Francis M. (Francis Maitland)
Science
The works of Francis Maitland Balfour, Volume 1 (of 4) : $b Separate memoirs
Balfour, Francis M. (Francis Maitland)
Embryology; Zoology
The absolute division of the nucleus has been stated to occur in animal
cells, but the number of instances where the evidence is quite conclusive
are not very numerous. Recently F. E. Schultze[83] appears to have observed
it in the case of an Amoeba in an altogether satisfactory manner. The
instance is quoted by Flemming[84]. Schultze saw the nucleus assume a
dumb-bell shape, divide, and the two halves collect themselves together.
The whole process occupied a minute and a half and was shortly followed by
the division of the Amoeba, which occupied eight minutes. Amongst vegetable
cells the division of the nucleus seems to be still rarer than with animal
cells. Sachs[85] admits the division of the nucleus in the case of the
parenchyma cells of certain Dicotyledons (Sambucus, Helianthus, Lysimachia,
Polygonum, Silene) on the authority of Hanstein.
Footnote 83: _Archiv f. Micr. Anat._ XI. p. 592.
Footnote 84: "Entwicklungsgeschicte der Najaden," LXXI. Bd.
_der Sitz. der k. Acad. Wien_, 1875.
Footnote 85: _Text-Book of Botany_, English trans. p. 19.
The division of the nucleus during cell-division, though seemingly not very
common, must therefore be considered as a thoroughly well authenticated
occurrence.
The frequent disappearance of the nucleus during cell-division is now so
thoroughly recognised, both for animal and vegetable cells, as to require
no further mention.
In many cases the partial or complete disappearance of the nucleus is
accompanied by the formation of two peculiar star-like figures. Appearances
of the kind have been described by Fol[86], Flemming[87], Auerbach[88] and
possibly also Oellacher[89] as well as other observers.
Footnote 86: "Entw. d. Geryonideneies." _Jenaische
Zeitschrift_, Bd. VII.
Footnote 87: _Loc. cit._
Footnote 88: _Organologische Studien_, Zweites Heft.
Footnote 89: "Beiträge z. Entwicklungsgeschichte der
Knochenfischen." _Zeit. für Wiss. Zoologie_. Bd. XXII. 1872.
These figures[90] are possibly due to the streaming out of the protoplasm
of the nucleus into that of the cell[91]. The appearance of striation may
on this hypothesis be explained as due to the presence of granules in the
protoplasm. When the streaming out of the protoplasm of a nucleus into that
of a cell takes place, any large granule which cannot be moved by the
stream will leave behind it a slack area where there is no movement of the
fluid. Any granules which are carried into this area will remain there, and
by the continuation of a process of this kind a row of granules may be
formed, and a series of such rows would produce an appearance of striation.
In many cases, _e.g._ Anodon, vide Flemming[92], even the larger
yolk-spherules are arranged in this fashion.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account