The works of Francis Maitland Balfour, Volume 2 (of 4) : $b A treatise on comparative embryology: InvertebrataBalfour, Francis M. (Francis Maitland)
Science
The works of Francis Maitland Balfour, Volume 2 (of 4) : $b A treatise on comparative embryology: Invertebrata
Balfour, Francis M. (Francis Maitland)
Embryology; Zoology
In the Tubularidæ and in Hydra an abbreviated development leads no
doubt to the absence of a _free_ planula stage, and the absence
of a larval form amongst the Ctenophora may, as has already been
stated, be probably explained in the same way.
The Coelenterata of all the Metazoa are characterized by the greatest
simplicity in the arrangement of their germinal layers; and for this
reason very considerable interest attaches to the mode of formation of
the layers amongst them. Two germinal layers are constantly found,
which correspond _in a general way_ to the epiblast and hypoblast. It
might have been anticipated that a certain amount of uniformity would
have existed in the mode of formation of the layers. This however is
not the case. In perhaps the majority of forms they become
differentiated by a process of delamination, but in a not
inconsiderable minority the two layers owe their origin to an
invagination.
Delamination is constant (with the doubtful exception of some
Tubularidæ) amongst the Hydromedusæ and Siphonophora. It is perhaps in
the main characteristic of the Actinozoa.
Invagination by embole takes place, so far as is known, constantly
amongst the Acraspeda and frequently amongst the Actinozoa;
and an epibolic invagination is characteristic of the Ctenophora.
If confidence is to be placed in the recorded observations on which
this summary is founded, and there is no reason why in a general way
it should not be so placed, the conclusion is inevitable that of the
above modes of development the one must be primitive and the other a
derivative from it, for, if this conclusion be not accepted, the
absolutely inadmissible hypothesis of a double origin for the
Coelenterata would have to be adopted.
Two questions arise from these considerations:--
(1) Which is the primitive, delamination or invagination?
(2) How is the one of these to be derived from the other?
There is a great deal to be said in favour of both delamination and
invagination; but it will be convenient to defer all discussion of the
question to the general chapter on the formation of the layers
throughout the animal kingdom.
The hypoblast cells are often filled with yolk material, and secondary
modifications are thus produced in the development. The most important
examples of such modifications are found in the Siphonophora and
Ctenophora.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account