The works of Francis Maitland Balfour, Volume 3 (of 4) : $b A treatise on comparative embryology: VertebrataBalfour, Francis M. (Francis Maitland)
Science
The works of Francis Maitland Balfour, Volume 3 (of 4) : $b A treatise on comparative embryology: Vertebrata
Balfour, Francis M. (Francis Maitland)
Embryology; Zoology
The beak is formed of a pair of horny plates moulded on the upper and
lower pairs of labial cartilages. The upper valve of the beak is the
larger of the two, and covers the lower. The beak is surrounded by a
projecting lip formed of a circular fold of skin, the free edge of
which is covered by papillæ. Between the papillæ and the beak rows of
horny teeth are placed on the inner surface of the lip. There are
usually two rows of these on the upper side, the inner one not
continuous across the middle line, and three or four rows on the lower
side, the inner one or two divided into two lateral parts.
As the tadpole attains its full development, the suctorial organs
behind the mouth gradually atrophy. The alimentary canal, which is
(fig. 81) at first short, rapidly elongates, and fills up with its
numerous coils the large body cavity. In the meantime, the lungs
develop as outgrowths from the oesophagus.
Various features in the anatomy of the Tadpole point to its being a
repetition of a primitive vertebrate type. The nearest living
representative of this type appears to be the Lamprey.
The resemblance between the mouths of the Tadpole and Lamprey is very
striking, and many of the peculiarities of the larval skull of the
Anura, especially the position of the Meckelian cartilages and the
subocular arch, perhaps find their parallel in the skull of the
Lamprey[49]. The internal hypoblastic gill-sacks of the Frog, with
their branchial processes, are probably equivalent to the gill-sacks
of the Lamprey[50]; and it is not impossible that the common posterior
openings of the gill-pouches in Myxine are equivalent to the
originally paired openings of the branchial sack of the Tadpole.
[49] _Vide_ Huxley, "Craniofacial apparatus of Petromyzon."
_Journ. of Anat. and Phys._ Vol. X. 1876. Huxley's views about
the Meckelian arch, etc., are plausible, but it seems probable
from Scott's observations that true branchial bars are not
developed in the Lamprey. How far this fact necessarily disproves
Huxley's views is still doubtful.
[50] Conf. Huxley and Götte.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account