The works of Francis Maitland Balfour, Volume 3 (of 4) : $b A treatise on comparative embryology: VertebrataBalfour, Francis M. (Francis Maitland)
Science
The works of Francis Maitland Balfour, Volume 3 (of 4) : $b A treatise on comparative embryology: Vertebrata
Balfour, Francis M. (Francis Maitland)
Embryology; Zoology
The above description of the metamorphosis of the Frog applies fairly
to the majority of the Anura, but it is necessary to notice a few of
the more instructive divergences from the general type.
In the first place, several forms are known, which are hatched in the
condition of the adult. The exact amount of metamorphosis which these
forms pass through in the egg is still a matter of some doubt. Hylodes
Martinicensis is one of these forms. The larva no doubt acquires
within the egg a long tail; but while Bavay[52] states that it is
provided with external gills, which however are not covered by an
operculum, Peters[53] was unable to see any traces of such structures.
[52] _Annal. de Sciences Nat._, 5th Series, Vol. XVII., 1873.
[53] _Berlin. Monatsbericht_, 1876, p. 703, and _Nature_, April
5, 1877.
In Pipa Americana, and apparently in Pipa dorsigera also if a distinct
species, the larva leaves the cells on the back of the mother in a
condition closely resembling the adult. The embryos of both species
develop a long tail in the egg, which is absorbed before hatching, and
according to Wyman[54] P. Americana is also temporarily provided with
gills, which atrophy early.
[54] _Proceed. of Boston Nat. Hist. Society_, Vol. V., 1854.
The larva of Rhinoderma Darwinii is stated by Jiminez de la Espada to
be without external gills, and it appears to be hatched while still in
the laryngeal pouch of the male. In Nototrema marsupiatum the larvæ
are also stated to be without external gills.
Amongst the forms with remarkable developments Pseudis paradoxa
deserves especial mention, in that the tadpole of this form attains an
immensely greater bulk than the adult; a peculiarity which may be
simply a question of nutrition, or may perhaps be explained by
supposing that the larva resembles a real ancestral form, which was
much larger than the existing Frog.
Another form of perhaps still greater morphological interest is the
larva of Dactylethra. The chief peculiarities of this larva (fig. 83)
have been summarized by Parker (No. 107, p. 626), from whom I quote
the following passage:
_a._ "The mouth is not inferior in position, suctorial and small, but
is very wide like that of the 'Siluroids and Lophius;' has an
underhung lower jaw, an immensely long tentacle from each upper lip,
and possesses no trace of the primordial horny jaws of the ordinary
kind.
_b._ "In conformity with these characters the head is extremely flat
or depressed, instead of being high and thick.
_c._ "There are no claspers beneath the chin.
_d._ "The branchial orifice is not confined to the left side, but
exists on the right side also.
_e._ "The tail, like the skull, is remarkably chimæroid; it terminates
in a long thin pointed lash, and the whole caudal region is narrow and
elongated as compared with that of our ordinary Batrachian larvæ.
_f._ "The fore-limbs are not hidden beneath the opercular fold."
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account