The works of Francis Maitland Balfour, Volume 3 (of 4) : $b A treatise on comparative embryology: VertebrataBalfour, Francis M. (Francis Maitland)
Science
The works of Francis Maitland Balfour, Volume 3 (of 4) : $b A treatise on comparative embryology: Vertebrata
Balfour, Francis M. (Francis Maitland)
Embryology; Zoology
Such are the main features, presented by the mesoblast in
Elasmobranchii, which favour the view of its having originally formed
the walls of the alimentary diverticula. Against this view of its
nature are the facts (1) of the mesoblast plates being at first solid,
and (2) of the body cavity as a consequence of this never
communicating with the alimentary canal. These points, in view of our
knowledge of embryological modifications, cannot be regarded as great
difficulties in my hypothesis. We have many examples of organs, which,
though in most cases arising as involutions, yet appear in other cases
as solid ingrowths. Such examples are afforded by the optic vesicle,
auditory vesicle, and probably also by the central nervous system of
Osseous Fishes. In most Vertebrates these organs are formed as hollow
involutions from the exterior; in Osseous Fishes, however, as solid
involutions, in which a cavity is secondarily established.
[FIG. 186. HORIZONTAL SECTION THROUGH THE TRUNK OF AN EMBRYO OF
SCYLLIUM CONSIDERABLY YOUNGER THAN 28 F.
The section is taken at the level of the notochord, and shews the
separation of the cells to form the vertebral bodies from the
muscle-plates.
_ch._ notochord; _ep._ epiblast; _Vr._ rudiment of vertebral body;
_mp._ muscle-plate; _mp´._ portion of muscle-plate already
differentiated into longitudinal muscles.]
There are strong grounds for thinking that in all Vertebrates the
mesoblast plates on each side of the notochord originate
independently, much as in Elasmobranchii, and that the notochord is
derived from the axial hypoblast; but there are some difficulties in
the application of this general statement to all cases. In Amphibia,
Ganoids, and Petromyzon, where the dorsal hypoblast is formed by a
process of invagination as in Amphioxus, the dorsal mesoblast also
owes its origin to this invagination, in that the indifferent
invaginated layer becomes divided into hypoblast and mesoblast.
Amongst these forms the mesoblast sheet, when separated from the
hypoblast, is certainly _not_ continuous across the middle line in
Petromyzon (Calberla) and the Newt (Scott and Osborn), and doubtfully
so in the other forms. It arises, in fact, as in Elasmobranchii, as
two independent plates. The fact of these plates originating from an
invaginated layer can only be regarded in the light of an
approximation to the primitive type found in Amphioxus.
In Petromyzon and the Newt the whole axial plate of dorsal hypoblast
becomes separated off from the rest of the hypoblast as the notochord,
and this mode of origin for the notochord resembles more closely that
in Amphioxus than the mode of origin in Elasmobranchii.
In Teleostei, there is reason to think that the processes in the
formation of the mesoblast accord closely with what has been described
as typical for the Ichthyopsida, but there are still some points
involved in obscurity.
[FIG. 187. TRANSVERSE SECTION THROUGH AN EMBRYO RABBIT OF EIGHT
DAYS.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account