The works of Francis Maitland Balfour, Volume 3 (of 4) : $b A treatise on comparative embryology: VertebrataBalfour, Francis M. (Francis Maitland)
Science
The works of Francis Maitland Balfour, Volume 3 (of 4) : $b A treatise on comparative embryology: Vertebrata
Balfour, Francis M. (Francis Maitland)
Embryology; Zoology
If the above position be admitted, it is not permissible to shirk the
conclusions which seem necessarily to follow, however great the
difficulties may be which are involved in their acceptance. These
conclusions have in part already been dealt with by Dohrn in his
suggestive tract (No. 250). In the first place the alimentary canal
must primitively have been continued to the end of the tail; and if
so, it is hardly credible that the existing anus can have been the
original one. Although, therefore, it is far from easy, on the
physiological principles involved in the Darwinian theory, to
understand the formation of a new anus[112]; it is nevertheless
necessary to believe that the present vertebrate anus is a formation
acquired within the group of the Chordata, and not inherited from some
older group. This involves a series of further consequences. The
opening of the urinogenital ducts into the cloaca must also be
secondary, and it is probable that the segmental tubes were
primitively continued along the whole postanal region of the
vertebrate tail, opening into the body cavity which embryology proves
to have been originally present there. They are in fact continued in
many existing forms for some distance behind the present anus. If the
present anus is secondary, there must have been a primitive anus,
which was probably situated behind the postanal vesicle; and therefore
in the region of the neurenteric canal. The neurenteric canal is,
however, the remnant of the blastopore (_vide_ p. 277). It follows,
therefore, _that the vertebrate blastopore is probably almost, if not
exactly identical in position with the primitive anus_. This
consideration may assist in explaining the remarkable phenomenon of
the existence of the neurenteric canal. The attempt has already been
made to shew that the central canal of the nervous system is really a
groove converted into a tube and lined by the external epidermis. This
tube (as may be concluded from embryological considerations) was
probably at first open posteriorly, and no doubt terminated at the
primitive anus. On the closure of the primitive anal opening, the
terminal portions of the postanal gut and the neural tube, may
conceivably have been so placed that both of them opened into a common
cavity, which previously had communication with the exterior by the
anus. Such an arrangement would necessarily result in the formation of
a neurenteric canal. It seems not impossible that a dilated vesicle,
often present at the end of the postanal gut (_vide_ fig. 28*, p. 58),
may have been the common cavity into which both neural and alimentary
tubes opened[113]. Till further light is thrown by fresh discoveries
upon the primitive condition of the posterior continuation of the
vertebrate alimentary tract, it is perhaps fruitless to attempt to
work out more in detail the above speculation.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account