The works of Francis Maitland Balfour, Volume 3 (of 4) : $b A treatise on comparative embryology: VertebrataBalfour, Francis M. (Francis Maitland)
Science
The works of Francis Maitland Balfour, Volume 3 (of 4) : $b A treatise on comparative embryology: Vertebrata
Balfour, Francis M. (Francis Maitland)
Embryology; Zoology
Fig. 1, ovum; fig. 2, stage in segmentation; fig. 3, commencement of
delamination after the appearance of a central cavity; fig. 4,
delamination completed, mouth forming at _M._ In figs. 1, 2, and 3,
_Ec._ is ectoplasm, and _En._ is endoplasm. In fig. 4, _Ec._ is
epiblast, and _En._ hypoblast. _E._ and _F._ food particles.]
Though embryology does not at present furnish us with a definite
answer to the question how the Metazoa became developed from the
Protozoa, it is nevertheless worth while reviewing some of the
processes by which this can be conceived to have occurred.
On purely _à priori_ grounds there is in my opinion more to be said
for invagination than for any other view.
On this view we may suppose that the colony of Protozoa in the course
of conversion into Metazoa had the form of a blastosphere; and that at
one pole of this a depression appeared. The cells lining this
depression we may suppose to have been amoeboid, and to have carried
on the work of digestion; while the remaining cells were probably
ciliated. The digestion may be supposed to have been at first carried
on in the interior of the cells, as in the Protozoa; but, as the
depression became deeper (in order to increase the area of nutritive
cells and to retain the food) a digestive secretion probably became
poured out from the cells lining it, and the mode of digestion
generally characteristic of the Metazoa was thereby inaugurated. It
may be noted that an intracellular protozoon type of digestion
persists in the Porifera, and appears also to occur in many
Coelenterata, Turbellaria, &c., though in most of these cases both
kinds of digestion probably go on simultaneously[122].
[122] J. Parker, "On the Histology of _Hydra fusca_," _Quart.
Journ. Micr. Science_, vol. XX. 1880; and El. Metschnikoff, "Ueb.
die intracelluläre Verdauung bei Coelenteraten," _Zoologischer
Anzeiger_, No. 56, vol. III. 1880 and Lankester, "On the
intracellular digestion and endoderm of Limnocodium," _Quart.
Journ. Micr. Science_, vol. XXI. 1881.
Another hypothetical mode of passage, which fits in with delamination,
has been put forward by Lankester, and is illustrated by fig. 205. He
supposes that at the blastosphere stage the fluid in the centre of the
colony acquired special digestive properties; the inner ends of the
cells having at this stage somewhat different properties from the
outer, and the food being still incepted by the surface of the cells
(fig. 205, 3). In a later stage of the process the inner portions of
the cells became separated off as the hypoblast; while the food,
though still ingested in the form of solid particles by the
superficial cells, was carried through the protoplasm into the central
digestive cavity. Later (fig. 205, 4), the point where the food
entered became localised, and eventually a mouth became formed at this
point.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account