The works of Francis Maitland Balfour, Volume 3 (of 4) : $b A treatise on comparative embryology: VertebrataBalfour, Francis M. (Francis Maitland)
Science
The works of Francis Maitland Balfour, Volume 3 (of 4) : $b A treatise on comparative embryology: Vertebrata
Balfour, Francis M. (Francis Maitland)
Embryology; Zoology
(71) M. Lereboullet. "Recherches d'Embryologie comparée sur le
développement de la Truite." _An. Sci. Nat._, quatrième série, Vol.
XVI. 1861.
(72) T. Oellacher. "Beiträge zur Entwicklungsgeschichte der
Knochenfische nach Beobachtungen am Bachforellenei." _Zeit. f. wiss.
Zool._, Vol. XXII., 1872, and Vol. XXIII., 1873.
(72*) H. Rathke. _Abh. z. Bildung u. Entwick. d. Menschen u. Thiere._
Leipzig, 1832-3. Part II. Blennius.
(73) Reineck. "Ueber die Schichtung des Forellenkeims." _Archiv f.
mikr. Anat._, Bd. V. 1869.
(74) S. Stricker. "Untersuchungen über die Entwicklung der
Bachforelle." _Sitzungsberichte der Wiener k. Akad. d. Wiss._, 1865.
Vol. LI. Abth. 2.
(75) Carl Vogt. "Embryologie des Salmones." _Histoire Naturelle des
Poissons de l'Europe Centrale._ L. Agassiz. 1842.
(76) C. Weil. "Beiträge zur Kenntniss der Knochenfische."
_Sitzungsber. der Wiener kais. Akad. der Wiss._, Bd. LXVI. 1872.
CHAPTER V.
CYCLOSTOMATA[23].
[23] The following classification of the Cyclostomata is employed
in the present chapter:
I. Hyperoartia ex. Petromyzon.
II. Hyperotreta ex. Myxine, Bdellostoma.
Petromyzon is the only type of this degenerated but primitive group of
Fishes the development of which has been as yet studied[24].
[24] The present chapter is in the main founded upon observations
which I was able to make in the spring of 1880 upon the
development of Petromyzon Planeri. Mr Scott very kindly looked
over my proof-sheets and made a number of valuable suggestions,
and also sent me an early copy of his preliminary note (No. 87),
which I have been able to make use of in correcting my
proof-sheets.
The development does not however throw any light on the relationships
of the group. The similarity of the mouth and other parts of
Petromyzon to those of the Tadpole probably indicates that there
existed a common ancestral form for the Cyclostomata and Amphibia.
Embryology does not however add anything to the anatomical evidence on
this subject. The fact of the segmentation being complete was at one
time supposed to indicate an affinity between the two groups; but the
discovery that the segmentation is also complete in the Ganoids
deprives this feature in the development of any special weight. In the
formation of the layers and in most other developmental characters
there is nothing to imply a special relationship with the Amphibia,
and in the mode of formation of the nervous system Petromyzon exhibits
a peculiar modification, otherwise only known to occur in Teleostei
and Lepidosteus.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account