The Works of George Berkeley. Vol. 1 of 4: Philosophical Works, 1705-21Berkeley, George
Philosophy
The Works of George Berkeley. Vol. 1 of 4: Philosophical Works, 1705-21
Berkeley, George
Philosophy -- Early works to 1800
sense comes from towards _A_. But, from our tenets it should seem
to follow that it would appear before the eye at a vast distance
off, so great as should in some sort surpass all sensible
distance. For since, if we exclude all anticipations and
prejudices, every object appears by so much the farther off by how
much the rays it sends to the eye are less diverging; and that
object is thought to be most remote from which parallel rays
proceed unto the eye; reason would make one think that object
should appear at yet a greater distance which is seen by
converging rays. Moreover, it may in general be asked concerning
this case, what it is that determines the apparent place of the
point _A_, and maketh it to appear after a constant manner,
sometimes nearer, at other times farther off? To which doubt I see
nothing that can be answered agreeable to the principles we have
laid down, except only that the point _A_ ought always to appear
extremely remote. But, on the contrary, we are assured by
experience, that the point _A_ appears variously distant,
according to the different situations of the eye between the
points _B_ and _Z_. And that it doth almost never (if at all) seem
farther off than it would if it were beheld by the naked eye; but,
on the contrary, it doth sometimes appear much nearer. Nay, it is
even certain that by how much the rays falling on the eye do more
converge, by so much the nearer does the object seem to approach.
For, the eye being placed close to the point _B_, the object _A_
appears nearly in its own natural place, if the point _B_ is taken
in the glass, or at the same distance, if in the speculum. The eye
being brought back to _O_, the object seems to draw near; and,
being come to _P_, it beholds it still nearer: and so on by little
and little, till at length the eye being placed somewhere, suppose
at _Q_, the object appearing extremely near begins to vanish into
mere confusion. All which doth seem repugnant to our principles;
at least, not rightly to agree with them. Nor is our tenet alone
struck at by this experiment, but likewise all others that ever
came to my knowledge are every whit as much endangered by it. The
ancient one especially (which is most commonly received, and comes
nearest to mine) seems to be so effectually overthrown thereby
that the most learned Tacquet has been forced to reject that
principle, as false and uncertain, on which alone he had built
almost his whole _Catoptrics_, and consequently, by taking away
the foundation, hath himself pulled down the superstructure he had
raised on it. Which, nevertheless, I do not believe he would have
done, had he but considered the whole matter more thoroughly, and
examined the difficulty to the bottom. But as for me, neither this
nor any other difficulty shall have so great an influence on me,
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account