The Works of George Berkeley. Vol. 1 of 4: Philosophical Works, 1705-21Berkeley, George
Philosophy
The Works of George Berkeley. Vol. 1 of 4: Philosophical Works, 1705-21
Berkeley, George
Philosophy -- Early works to 1800
(M156) God may comprehend all ideas, even the ideas wch are painfull &
unpleasant, without being in any degree pained thereby(131). Thus we
ourselves can imagine the pain of a burn, &c. without any misery or
uneasiness at all.
(M157) Truth, three sorts thereof—natural, mathematical, & moral.
(M158) Agreement of relation onely where numbers do obtain: of
co-existence, in nature: of signification, by including, in morality.
(M159) Gyant who shakes the mountain that’s on him must be acknowledged.
Or rather thus: I am no more to be reckon’d stronger than Locke than a
pigmy should be reckon’d stronger than a gyant, because he could throw off
the molehill wch lay upon him, and the gyant could onely shake or shove
the mountain that oppressed him. This in the Preface.
(M160) Promise to extend our knowledge & clear it of those shamefull
contradictions which embarrass it. Something like this to begin the
Introduction in a modest way(132).
(M161) Whoever shall pretend to censure any part, I desire he would read
out the whole, else he may perhaps not understand me. In the Preface or
Introduction(133).
(M162) Doctrine of identity best explain’d by taking the Will for
volitions, the Understanding for ideas. The difficulty of consciousness of
wt are never acted surely solv’d thereby.
(M163) I must acknowledge myself beholding to the philosophers who have
gone before me. They have given good rules, though certainly they do not
always observe them. Similitude of adventurers, who, tho’ they attained
not the desired port, they by their wrecks have made known the rocks and
sands, whereby the passage of aftercomers is made more secure & easy.
Preface or Introduction.
(M164) The opinion that men had ideas of moral actions(134) has render’d
the demonstrating ethiques very difficult to them.
(M165) An idea being itself unactive cannot be the resemblance or image of
an active thing.
(M166) Excuse to be made in the Introduction for using the word _idea_,
viz. because it has obtain’d. But a caution must be added.
Scripture and possibility are the onely proofs(135) with Malbranch. Add to
these what he calls a great propension to think so: this perhaps may be
questioned. Perhaps men, if they think before they speak, will not be
found so thoroughly persuaded of the existence of Matter.
(M167) On second thoughts I am on t’other extream. I am certain of that
wch Malbranch seems to doubt of, viz. the existence of bodies(136).
(M168) Mem. To bring the killing blow at the last, e.g. in the matter of
abstraction to bring Locke’s general triangle in the last(137).
(M169) They give good rules, tho’ perhaps they themselves do not always
observe them. They speak much of clear and distinct ideas, though at the
same time they talk of general abstract ideas, &c. I’ll [instance] in
Locke’s opinion of abstraction, he being as clear a writer as I have met
with.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account