The Works of George Berkeley. Vol. 1 of 4: Philosophical Works, 1705-21Berkeley, George
Philosophy
The Works of George Berkeley. Vol. 1 of 4: Philosophical Works, 1705-21
Berkeley, George
Philosophy -- Early works to 1800
(M215) Locke to Limborch, &c. Talk of _judicium intellectus_ preceding the
volition: I think _judicium_ includes volition. I can by no means
distinguish these—_judicium_, _intellectus_, _indifferentia_, uneasiness
to many things accompanying or preceding every volition, as e.g. the
motion of my hand.
(M216) Qu. Wt mean you by my perceptions, my volitions? Both all the
perceptions I perceive or conceive(157), &c. are mine; all the volitions I
am conscious to are mine.
(M217) Homo est agens liberum. What mean they by _homo_ and _agens_ in
this place?
(M218) Will any man say that brutes have ideas of Unity & Existence? I
believe not. Yet if they are suggested by all the ways of sensation, ’tis
strange they should want them(158).
(M219) It is a strange thing and deserves our attention, that the more
time and pains men have consum’d in the study of philosophy, by so much
the more they look upon themselves to be ignorant & weak creatures. They
discover flaws and imperfections in their faculties wch other men never
spy out. They find themselves under a necessity of admitting many
inconsistent, irreconcilable opinions for true. There is nothing they
touch with their hand, or behold with their eyes, but has its dark sides
much larger and more numerous than wt is perceived, & at length turn
scepticks, at least in most things. I imagine all this proceeds from, &c.
Exord. Introd.(159)
(M220) These men with a supercilious pride disdain the common single
information of sense. They grasp at knowledge by sheafs & bundles. (’Tis
well if, catching at too much at once, they hold nothing but emptiness &
air.) They in the depth of their understanding contemplate abstract ideas.
It seems not improbable that the most comprehensive & sublime intellects
see more m.v.’s at once, i.e. that their visual systems are the largest.
Words (by them meaning all sorts of signs) are so necessary that, instead
of being (wn duly us’d or in their own nature) prejudicial to the
advancement of knowledge, or an hindrance to knowledge, without them there
could in mathematiques themselves be no demonstration.
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
Mem. To be eternally banishing Metaphisics, &c., and recalling men to
Common Sense(160).
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
(M221) We cannot conceive other minds besides our own but as so many
selves. We suppose ourselves affected wth such & such thoughts & such and
such sensations(161).
(M222) Qu. whether composition of ideas be not that faculty which chiefly
serves to discriminate us from brutes? I question whether a brute does or
can imagine a blue horse or chimera.
Naturalists do not distinguish betwixt cause and occasion. Useful to
enquire after co-existing ideas or occasions.
(M223) Morality may be demonstrated as mixt mathematics.
(M224) Perception is passive, but this not distinct from idea. Therefore
there can be no idea of volition.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account