The works of John Dryden, now first collected in eighteen volumes. Volume 17Dryden, John
General
The works of John Dryden, now first collected in eighteen volumes. Volume 17
Dryden, John
English literature
I must not say, the _poor_ bishop of Winchester is used unmercifully by
him, for he calls him “that prelate of rich memory;”[91] as though, like
some popes, he had been considerable for nothing but for leaving a rich
nephew. But as he was a person of known loyalty, piety, and learning, so
he was of great charity, and a public spirit, which he showed, both in
his lifetime, and at his death. Could nothing be said of him, then, but
“that prelate of rich memory?” or, had he a mind to tell us he was no
poet? or, that he was out of the temptation of changing his religion for
bread?
The bishop of Worcester is charged with downright prevarication,
_i.e._ being in his heart for the church of Rome, but for mean reasons
continuing in the communion of the church of England. “Therefore,”
saith he, “take him, Topham; and now what can I do more for the poor
bishop?”[92] The most he will allow him is, “that he was a peaceable old
gentleman, who only desired to possess his conscience and his bishopric
in peace, without offence to any man, either of the Catholic church, or
that of England.” Yet he hath so much kindness left for the poor bishop,
that for his sake he goes about to defend, “that a man may be a true
member of the church of England, who asserts both churches to be so far
parts of the Catholic church, that there is no necessity of going from
one church to another to be saved.”[93]
This is a very surprising argument from a new convert. Why might he not
then have continued still in the communion of this church, though he
might look on the church of Rome as part of the Catholic church? The
reason I gave against it was, that every true member of this church must
own the doctrine of it contained in the Articles and Homilies, which
charge the church of Rome with such errors and unlawful practices, as no
man who believes them to be such, can continue in the communion of that
church; and therefore he must believe a necessity of the forsaking of one
communion for the other; and that no true member of this church can, with
a good conscience, leave this church, and embrace the other.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account