English drama -- 17th century; English poetry -- Early modern, 1500-1700
[418] Spanish hats, fashionable at this time. "From Spain what
bringeth our traveller? A skull-crown'd hat of the fashion of an
old deep porrenger," &c.--Nashe's _Unfortunate Traveller_.
[419] See note, vol. ii. p. 391.
[420] So in the _Debate between Pride and Lowliness_:--"The
nether-stocks of pure Granada silk." See Fairholt's _History of
Costume_, 1860, p. 211.
[421] Serving-men.
[422] It was the custom to paste on a pillar near the theatre the
title of the play that was to be acted.
[423] In the suburbs--particularly near the Curtain Theatre--were
many gardens, "either paled or walled round very high, with their
arbours and bowers" (Stubbes), to which libertines resorted. See
Mr. Halliwell-Phillipps' chapter on "The Theatre and Curtain" in
_Outlines of the Life of Shakespeare_.
[424] An allusion to a jest (common in the fugitive poetry of the
time) about a beggar-wench, with a child at her back, who refused
the advances of a knight (on the ground that the child would be
injured in the amorous encounter), unless he would allow the
child to be strapped to his own back.
[425] "Proface"--an exclamation of welcome from the host to his
guests at a feast. See Nares' _Glossary_.
_To those that seem judicial Perusers._
Know, I hate to affect too much obscurity and harshness, because they
profit no sense. To note vices, so that no man can understand them, is
as fond as the French execution in picture. Yet there are some (too
many) that think nothing good that is so courteous as to come within
their reach. Terming all satires bastard which are not palpable dark,
and so rough writ that the hearing of them read would set a man's
teeth on edge; for whose unseasoned palate I wrote the first Satire,
in some places too obscure, in all places misliking me. Yet when by
some scurvy chance it shall come into the late perfumed fist of
judicial Torquatus[426] (that, like some rotten stick in a troubled
water, hath got a great deal of barmy[427] froth to stick to his
sides), I know he will vouchsafe it some of his new-minted epithets
(as _real_, _intrinsicate_, _Delphic_), when in my conscience he
understands not the least part of it. But from thence proceeds his
judgment. Persius is crabby, because ancient, and his jerks (being
particularly given to private customs of his time) dusky. Juvenal
(upon the like occasion) seems to our judgment gloomy. Yet both of
them go a good seemly pace, not stumbling, shuffling. Chaucer is hard
even to our understandings: who knows not the reason? how much more
those old satires which express themselves in terms that breathed not
long even in their days. But had we then lived, the understanding of
them had been nothing hard. I will not deny there is a seemly decorum
to be observed, and a peculiar kind of speech for a satire's lips,
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account