The works of the Rev. John Wesley, Vol. 03 (of 32)Wesley, John
Religion
The works of the Rev. John Wesley, Vol. 03 (of 32)
Wesley, John
Methodist Church; Theology -- Early works to 1800; Theology -- History -- 18th century
4. The very least which can be implied in these words, is, that the
persons spoken of therein, namely, all real Christians or believers
in Christ, are made free from outward sin. And the same freedom which
St. _Paul_ here expresses in such variety of phrases, St. _Peter_
expresses in that one (_1 Pet._ iv. 1, 2.) _He that hath suffered in
the flesh, hath ceased from sin,――that he no longer should live――to the
desires of men, but to the will of God._ For this _ceasing from sin_,
if it be interpreted in the lowest sense, as regarding only the outward
behaviour, must denote the ceasing from the outward act, from any
outward transgression of the law.
5. But most express are the well known words of St. _John_, in
the third chapter of his first epistle, verse the eighth, &c. _He
that committeth sin is of the devil: for the devil sinneth from the
beginning. For this purpose the Son of God was manifested, that he
might destroy the works of the devil. Whosoever is born of God, doth
not commit sin. For his seed remaineth in him, and he cannot sin,
because he is born of God._ And those in the fifth, verse 18. _We know
that whosoever ♦is born of God sinneth not. But he that is begotten of
God keepeth himself, and that wicked one toucheth him not._
6. Indeed it is said, this means only, he sinneth not _wilfully_; or
he doth not commit sin _habitually_; or, _not as other men do_; or,
_not as he did before_. But by whom is this said? By St. _John_? No.
There is no such word in the text: nor in the whole chapter; nor in all
this epistle; nor in any part of his writings whatsoever. Why then, the
best way to answer a bold assertion is, simply to deny it. And if any
man can prove it from the word of God, let him bring forth his strong
reasons.
7. And a sort of reason there is, which has been frequently brought to
support these strange assertions, drawn from the examples recorded in
the word of God, “What say they, did not _Abraham_ himself commit sin,
prevaricating and denying his wife? Did not _Moses_ commit sin, when
he provoked God, _at the waters of strife_? Nay, to produce one for
all, did not even _David, the man after God’s own heart_, commit sin,
in the matter of _Uriah_ the _Hittite_, even murder and adultery?” It
is most sure he did. All this is true. But what is it you would infer
from hence? It may be granted, _first_, that _David_, in the general
course of his life, was one of the holiest men among the _Jews_. And,
_secondly_, that the holiest men among the _Jews did sometimes commit
sin_. But if you would hence infer, that _all Christians do, and must
commit sin, as long as they live_: this consequence we utterly deny. It
will never follow from those premisses.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account