The works of the Rev. John Wesley, Vol. 03 (of 32)Wesley, John
Religion
The works of the Rev. John Wesley, Vol. 03 (of 32)
Wesley, John
Methodist Church; Theology -- Early works to 1800; Theology -- History -- 18th century
13. Those who have duly considered these things must allow, that the
privileges of Christians, are in no wise to be measured by what the
Old Testament records concerning those who were under the _Jewish_
dispensation: seeing the fulness of times is now come; the Holy Ghost
is now given: the great salvation of God is brought unto men, by the
revelation of Jesus Christ. The kingdom of heaven is now set up on
earth: concerning which the Spirit of God declared of old (so far is
_David_ from being the pattern or standard of Christian perfection)
_He that is feeble among them at that day, shall be as_ David: _and the
house of_ David _shall be as God, as the angel of the Lord before them_
(Zech. xii. 8.)
14. If therefore you would prove that the apostle’s words, _he that
is born of God sinneth not_, are not to be understood, according to
their plain, natural, obvious meaning, it is from the New Testament you
are to bring your proofs: else you will fight as one that beateth the
air. And the first of these which is usually brought is taken from the
examples recorded in the New Testament. “The apostles themselves (it
is said) committed sin: nay the greatest of them. _Peter_ and _Paul_:
St. _Paul_, by his sharp contention with _Barnabas_, and St. _Peter_,
by his dissimulation at _Antioch_.” Well; suppose both _Peter_ and
_Paul_ did then commit sin: what is it you would infer from hence? That
_all the other apostles_ committed sin sometimes? There is no shadow
of proof in this. Or, would you thence infer, that _all the other
Christians_ of the apostolic age committed sin? Worse and worse; this
is such an inference as one would imagine a man in his senses could
never have thought of. Or, will you argue thus? “If two of the apostles
did once commit sin, then _all other Christians, in all ages_, do, and
will commit sin as long as they live.” Alas, my brother! a child of
common understanding, would be ashamed of such reasoning as this. Least
of all can you with any colour of argument infer, “That any man _must_
commit sin at all.” No; God forbid we should thus speak. No necessity
of sinning was laid upon _them_. The grace of God was surely sufficient
for them. And it _is_ sufficient for _us_ at this day. With the
temptation which fell on _them_, there _was_ a way to escape: as there
_is_ to every soul of man in every temptation. So that whosoever is
tempted to any sin, _need_ not yield; for no man is tempted above that
he is able to bear.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account