The works of the Rev. John Wesley, Vol. 03 (of 32)Wesley, John
Religion
The works of the Rev. John Wesley, Vol. 03 (of 32)
Wesley, John
Methodist Church; Theology -- Early works to 1800; Theology -- History -- 18th century
4. *We read of an antient king, who being desirous to know, what
was the _natural language_ of men, in order to bring the matter to a
certain issue, made the following experiment. He ordered two infants
as soon as they were born, to be conveyed to a place prepared for them,
where they were brought up without any instruction at all, and without
ever hearing an human voice. And what was the event? Why, that when
they were at length brought out of their confinement, they spake no
language at all; they uttered only inarticulate sounds, like those of
other animals. Were two infants in like manner to be brought up from
the womb, without being instructed in any religion, there is little
room to doubt, but (unless the grace of God interposed) the event would
be just the same. They would have no religion at all: they would have
no more knowledge of God, than the beasts of the field, than _the wild
ass’s colt_. Such is _Natural religion_! Abstracted from traditional,
and from the influences of God’s Spirit.
5. And having no knowledge, we can have no love of God: we cannot love
him we know not. Most men _talk_ indeed of loving God, and perhaps
imagine they do. At least, few will acknowledge they do not love him:
but the fact is too plain to be denied. No man loves God by nature,
any more than he does a stone, or the earth he treads upon. What we
love, we delight in: but no man has naturally any delight in God. In
our natural state, we cannot conceive, how any one should delight in
him. We take no pleasure in him at all: he is utterly tasteless to us.
To love God! It is far above, out of our sight. We cannot, naturally,
attain unto it.
6. *We have by nature not only no love, but no fear of God. It
is allowed indeed, that most men have, sooner or later, a kind of
senseless, irrational fear, properly called _superstition_, though the
blundering _Epicureans_ gave it the name of _religion_. Yet even this
is not natural, but acquired; chiefly by conversation or from example.
By nature, God _is not in all our thoughts_: we leave him to manage his
own affairs, to sit quietly, as we imagine, in heaven, and leave us on
earth to manage ours. So that we have no more of the fear of God before
our eyes, than of the love of God in our hearts.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account