The works of the Rev. John Wesley, Vol. 08 (of 32)Wesley, John
Religion
The works of the Rev. John Wesley, Vol. 08 (of 32)
Wesley, John
Methodist Church; Theology -- Early works to 1800; Theology -- History -- 18th century
*8. Again, it passes for an extraordinary part of learning to
understand history: that is, in other words, to know what a company
of silly creatures called men, have been doing for almost these six
thousand years. Now, what is my understanding the perfecter for this?
I deny not, that there are some matters of fact, as the more remarkable
turns of ecclesiastical history, and the greater revolutions of the
civil world, which are of moment to be known; because, by discovering
to us the conduct of divine providence, they supply us with occasions
of acknowledging and adoring the wisdom and goodness of God. Neither
do I deny, that there are many other historical passages, which may
be of moment to be known; tho’ not as perfective of our understanding,
but as touching our interest. And so it may be of moment to me to know,
the clock has struck one, if I have made an assignation at that time;
but sure the bare naked theory of the clock’s having struck one, will
add but little to my intellectual perfection. The most trivial matter
of fact in the world is worth knowing, if I have any concern depending
upon it: and the greatest without that, is utterly insignificant. So
that ’tis not from perfecting of our understanding, but from the
relation they have to our interest, that these things deserve to be
known.
*9. I would desire the great magnifiers of history only to answer
me this one question. Suppose such and such matters of fact, in the
knowing which they perhaps glory more, than the actors themselves did
in the doing them, had never been done? Suppose _Fabius_ had never
weathered out _Hannibal_ by delays, nor _Cyrus_ took _Babylon_ by
draining the river into the ditches: what diminution would this have
been to the perfection of their understanding? They cannot say it would
have been any. And why then should the knowing them now they are done,
be reckoned an addition to it? And yet we find it is so, and that men
study these things, not only for their use, (that we allow) but for
their mere theory, placing learning in such history as has nothing
to commend it, but only that it tells you, such and such things were
done. Of this impertinent sort is the greatest part of the _Roman_
and _Grecian_ history: which, had not the world voted it for learning,
would no more concern a man to know, than that a bird has dropt a
feather upon the _Pyrenean_ mountains.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account