The works of the Rev. John Wesley, Vol. 08 (of 32)Wesley, John
Religion
The works of the Rev. John Wesley, Vol. 08 (of 32)
Wesley, John
Methodist Church; Theology -- Early works to 1800; Theology -- History -- 18th century
3. In order to make out the truth of this charge it will be necessary
first to consider, how far it becomes man to employ himself in the
prosecution of knowledge; and then it will be easy to determine,
whether our general pursuit of it be immoderate or no. Now for the
determination of the former, let us observe the present state of man,
the posture wherein he now stands.
4. And, First, The utmost knowledge man can arrive at in this world, by
his utmost endeavours, is very inconsiderable.
*God indeed has given us reason enough to distinguish us from the brute
creation, and we may improve it so far, as to distinguish ourselves
from one another: and so one man may deserve to be called learned
and knowing, in comparison of another that is less so. But absolutely
speaking, the most that any or all of us either know or can know,
is of little consideration. What we know of God is but little; for
as the apostle says, _We see through a glass darkly_: what we know of
ourselves perhaps is less, and what we know of the world about us, is
not much. “We have seen but a few of God’s works,” and we understand
yet fewer. There are almost an infinite number of things which we never
so much as thought of: and of most things we conceive very darkly and
uncertainly; and there is not one thing from the greatest to the least,
which we do or can understand throughly. Those that apply their whole
study to any one thing, can never come to the end of that; for not only
every science, but every particular of each has its unmeasurable depths
and recesses. ’Tis confest by a great enquirer into the nature of
_antimony_ (as ’tis related by Mr. _Boyle_) “That ’tis impossible for
one man to understand throughly that single mineral only.” And if a man
can’t understand _all_ of so _little_, how little must he understand
of all? Suppose farther, that all the knowledge of all the learned were
put together, it would weigh but light. For what one art or science is
there, that is brought to any tolerable perfection? And if the common
stock be so little, how small a pittance is it that must fall to every
particular man’s share? And where is that man, who after all his poring
and studying, is able to answer all the questions, I will not say which
God put to _Job_, but which may be asked him by the next idiot he meets?
5. ’Tis superfluous, as well as endless, to display the particulars
of our ignorance; though indeed, when all accounts are cast up, that
will be found to be our best knowledge. This only in general, our life
is so short, our progress in learning so slow, and learning itself
so long and tedious, and what we do or can know so very little, that
the sceptics had much more reason to conclude from the disability of
our faculties, and the slightness of our attainments, than from the
uncertainty and instability of truth, that there is no knowledge.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account