The works of the Rev. John Wesley, Vol. 08 (of 32)Wesley, John
Religion
The works of the Rev. John Wesley, Vol. 08 (of 32)
Wesley, John
Methodist Church; Theology -- Early works to 1800; Theology -- History -- 18th century
*9. This imperfect piety is farther condemned by Christian prudence as
very absurd. If we did not intend to go through, why did we set out? If
we did, why do we stop? If we think there is no reason in religion, why
do we any thing? But if we think there is, why don’t we do enough? For
the same reason that we do so much, why don’t we do more? For either
religion has truth on its side, or not. If not, why do we take so much
labour _needlesly_? But if it has, why do we take so much labour _in
vain_? ’Tis, I own, a strange piece of even brutal indifference, to do
nothing in order to our eternal happiness: and, yet, methinks, to do a
part only, has something in it more extravagant than the other. He that
does nothing, whatever he loses besides, has yet no labour to lose. But
to labour by halves, is to lose the same good, and all that we do in
order to it. The atheist and libertine have something to pretend; but
the half-religious has no excuse; since that very religion he has will
condemn him, as an inconsistent, unprincipled fool.
10. The last censure of Christian prudence upon the half-way state
of piety, is, that it is very unhappy, I mean even in this world. The
almost Christian is the _double-minded man_ St. _James_ speaks of, who
has two wills, one for God and another for the world, between which
he variously fluctuates. Such an one is _unstable in all his ways_:
he is a mixed, doubtful, unsettled, wavering creature, never out of
perplexities and intanglements, always disconformable to himself, doing
what he would not, and not doing what he would and should, never long
satisfied with himself. He has indeed a kindness for religion, but he
has a greater kindness for something else; so that his religion just
serves to disturb the enjoyment of his lusts, as his lusts to deprive
him of the comfort of his religion. Nor can he be perfectly at peace
with himself, but by being thoroughly wicked or thoroughly good. So
wicked as to _have his conscience sear’d with a hot iron_, or so good
as to act up to his principles. He must be of a single mind, one way
or the other, before he can be at rest. And yet this double-mindedness
is the state in which most men chuse to live and die, having religion
enough to disturb them in their sins, but not enough to engage them to
part with them.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account