The works of the Rev. John Wesley, Vol. 14 (of 32)Wesley, John
Religion
The works of the Rev. John Wesley, Vol. 14 (of 32)
Wesley, John
Methodist Church; Theology -- Early works to 1800; Theology -- History -- 18th century
Alas, Sir, what need have you to speak any more? You have already
granted all I desire, viz. That “we may _all now_ enjoy, and _know_
that we do enjoy, the heavenly direction of God’s Spirit.”
However, you go on, and observe that the _extraordinary gifts_ of
the Holy Ghost, were granted to the first Christians only, but his
_ordinary graces_ to all Christians in all ages: Both which you then
attempt to enumerate: Only suspending your discourse a little, when
“some conceited _enthusiasts_” come in your way.
2. You next enquire, “After what manner these graces are raised in our
souls?” And answer, “How to distinguish these heavenly motions, from
the natural operations of our minds, we have no light to discover.
The scriptures――declaring that the operations of the Holy Spirit,
are not subject to any sensible _feelings_ or perceptions. For what
communication can there be between _feelings_, which are properties
peculiar to matter, and the suggestions of the Spirit?――――All
reasonable Christians believe, that he works his graces in us in an
imperceptible manner; and that there is no sensible difference between
his and the natural operations of our minds.”
I conceive this to be the strength of your cause. To support that
conclusion, that the operations of the Spirit are imperceptible, you
here alledge, 1. “That all reasonable Christians believe this.” So
you say. But I want proof. 2. “That there can be no communications
(I fear, you mistook the word) between the suggestions of the Spirit,
and _feelings_ which are _properties peculiar_ to matter.” How! Are
the _feelings_ now in question, _properties peculiar to matter_? The
_feeling_ of peace, joy, love? Or any _feelings_ at all? I can no
more understand the philosophy than the divinity of this. 3. “That the
scriptures declare, the operations of the Spirit are not subject to
any _sensible feelings_.” You are here disproving, as you suppose, a
proposition of mine. But are you sure you understand it? By _feeling_,
I mean, being inwardly conscious of. By _the operations of the Spirit_,
I do not mean _the manner_ in which he operates, but _the graces_ which
he operates in a Christian. Now be pleased to produce those Scriptures
which declare, “That a Christian cannot _feel_ or _perceive these
operations_.”
3. Are you not convinced, Sir, that you have laid to my charge things
which I know not? I do not gravely tell you (as much an _enthusiast_ as
you over and over affirm me to be) “That I _sensibly feel_ (in _your_
sense) the motions of the Holy Spirit.” Much less do I “make this,
any more than convulsions, agonies, howlings, roarings, and violent
contorsions of the body,” either “Certain signs of mens being in
a state of salvation,” or “necessary in order thereunto.” You might
with equal justice and truth inform the world, and the worshipful the
magistrates of _Newcastle_, that I make _seeing the wind_, or _feeling_
the light, necessary to salvation.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account