The works of the Rev. John Wesley, Vol. 14 (of 32)Wesley, John
Religion
The works of the Rev. John Wesley, Vol. 14 (of 32)
Wesley, John
Methodist Church; Theology -- Early works to 1800; Theology -- History -- 18th century
After observing, that this is the very passage which your Lordship
mentions at the close of the other (but does not cite) I desire
every unprejudiced person to judge, whether _Origen_ does not clearly
determine, that _the power_, spoken of in this text, is in some measure
given to all true ministers in all ages?
22. The last scripture which your Lordship affirms “to be peculiar to
the times of the apostles,” is that in the first epistle of St. _John_,
concerning _the unction of the Holy One_.
To confirm this interpretation, we are referred to the authority of
_Origen_ and _Chrysostom_, on the parallel passages in St. _John_’s
gospel,” (page 42.)
But it has appeared, that both these fathers suppose those passages to
belong to all Christians. And consequently their authority (if these
are parallel passages) stands full against this interpretation.
Your Lordship subjoins, “I shall here only add that of the great
_Athanasius_, who (in his epistle to _Serapion_) interprets _The
unction from the Holy One_, not _merely_ of divine grace, but of the
_extraordinary_ gifts of the Holy Spirit.”
Nay, it is enough, if he interprets it _at all_ of _ordinary grace_,
such as is common to all Christians.
And this your Lordship allows he does. But I cannot allow that he
interprets it of any thing else. I cannot perceive, that he interprets
it _at all_, “of the _extraordinary_ gifts of the Holy Spirit.”
His words are, “The Holy Spirit is called, and is, the unction and the
seal. For _John_ writes, _The anointing which ye have received of him,
abideth in you; and ye need not that any man should teach you, but as
his anointing_, his Spirit, _teacheth you of all things_. Again, it is
written in the prophet _Isaiah_, _The Spirit of the |Lord| is upon me,
because he hath anointed me_. And _Paul_ writes thus; _In whom also ye
were sealed_. And again, _Grieve not the Holy Spirit of |God|, whereby
ye are sealed unto the day of redemption_. This anointing is the
breath of the Son, so that he who hath the Spirit may say, _We are the
sweet-smelling savour of |Christ|_. Because we are partakers of the
Holy Spirit, we have the Son: And having the Son, we have _the |Spirit|,
crying in our hearts, Abba, Father_.”
And so, in his oration against the _Arians_.
*“_He sendeth the |Spirit| of his |Son| into our hearts, crying, Abba,
Father._ His Son in us, invoking the Father, makes him to be called our
Father. Certainly God cannot be called their Father, who have not the
Son in their hearts.”
Is it not easy to be observed here, 1. That _Athanasius_ makes _that
testimony of the_ Spirit common to all the children of God: 2. That
he joins _the anointing of the Holy One_, with that seal of the Spirit
wherewith all that _persevere_ are _sealed to the day of redemption_:
And 3. That he does not, throughout this passage, speak of the
_extraordinary gifts_ at all?
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account