The works of the Rev. John Wesley, Vol. 14 (of 32)Wesley, John
Religion
The works of the Rev. John Wesley, Vol. 14 (of 32)
Wesley, John
Methodist Church; Theology -- Early works to 1800; Theology -- History -- 18th century
2. To prove this doctrine unscriptural, That “Faith alone is the
condition of justification,” you alledge, That “Sanctification,
according to scripture, must go before it:” To evince which, you
quote the following texts, which I leave as I find them: _Go, disciple
all nations――teaching them to observe all things, whatsoever I have
commanded them._¹ _He that believeth and is baptized shall be saved._²
_Preach repentance and remission of sins._³ _Repent and be baptized
every one of you, for the remission of sins._⁴ _Repent and be converted,
that your sins may be blotted out._⁵ _By one offering he hath perfected
for ever them that are sanctified._⁶ You add, “St. _Paul_ taught
_Repentance toward God, and faith toward our_ Lord Jesus Christ⁷;
and calls _Repentance from dead works, and faith toward God, first
principles_.⁸”
¹ _Matthew xxviii. 19, 20._
² _Mark xvi. 16._
³ _Luke xxiv. 47._
⁴ _Acts ii. 38._
⁵ ♦_Acts iii. 19._
⁶ _Hebrews x. 14._
⁷ _Acts xx. 21._
⁸ _Hebrews vi. 1._
♦ “C.” replaced with “Acts”
You subjoin, “_But ye are washed_, says he, _but ye are sanctified,
but ye are justified_. By _washed_ is meant their baptism; and by
their baptism is meant, first their sanctification, and then their
justification.” This is a flat begging the question; you take for
granted, the very point which you ought to prove. “St. _Peter_ also,
you say, affirms, That _baptism doth save us_ or justify us.” Again,
you beg the question: you take for granted what I utterly deny, viz.
That _save_ and _justify_ are here synonymous terms. ’Till this is
proved, you can draw no inference at all; for you have no foundation
whereon to build.
I conceive these and all the scriptures which can be quoted to prove
sanctification antecedent to justification, (if they do not relate to
our final justification) prove only (what I have never denied) that
repentance, or conviction of sin, and fruits meet for repentance,
precede that faith, whereby we are justified: but by no means, that the
love of God, or any branch of true holiness, must or can precede faith.
3. It is objected, Secondly, That justification by faith alone, is not
the doctrine of the church of _England_.
“You believe, says the writer above-mentioned, that no good work can
be previous to justification, nor consequently a condition of it. But
God be praised, our church has no where delivered such _abominable_
doctrine.” _Page 14._
“The clergy contend for inward holiness, as previous to the first
justification――this is the doctrine they universally inculcate, and
which you cannot oppose without contradicting the doctrine of our
church.” _Page 26._
“All your strongest persuasives to the love of God, will not blanch
over the deformity of that doctrine, that men may be justified――by
faith alone――Unless you publicly recant this _horrid_ doctrine, your
faith is vain.” _Page 27._
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account