The works of the Rev. John Wesley, Vol. 15 (of 32)Wesley, John
History
The works of the Rev. John Wesley, Vol. 15 (of 32)
Wesley, John
Methodist Church; Theology -- Early works to 1800; Theology -- History -- 18th century
5. In order to increase in them a grateful sense of all his mercies, I
desired that one evening in a quarter, all the men in band; on a second,
all the woman would meet; and on a third, both men and women together;
that we might together _eat bread_ (as the antient Christians did)
_with gladness and singleness of heart_. At these _Love-feasts_ (so we
termed them, retaining the name, as well as the thing, which was in use
from the beginning) our food is only a little plain cake and water. But
we seldom return from them, without being fed not only with the _meat
which perisheth_, but with _that which endureth to everlasting life_.
6. Great and many are the advantages which have ever since flowed, from
this closer union of the believers with each other. They prayed for one
another, that they might be healed of the faults they had confessed:
and it was so. The chains were broken: the bands were burst in sunder,
and sin had no more dominion over them. Many were delivered from
the temptations, out of which till then they found no way to escape.
They were built up in our most holy faith. They rejoiced in the Lord
more abundantly. They were strengthened in love, and more effectually
provoked to abound in every good work.
7. But it was soon objected to the _bands_ (as to the _classes_ before)
“These were not at first. There is no scripture for them. These are
men’s works, man’s building, man’s invention.” I reply, as before,
these are also prudential helps, grounded on reason and experience,
in order to apply the general rules given in scripture according to
particular circumstances.
8. An objection much more boldly and frequently urged, is that “all
these bands are mere _popery_.” I hope I need not pass a harder censure
on those (most of them at least) who affirm this, than that they
talk of they know not what, they betray in themselves the most gross
and shameful ignorance. Do not they yet know, that the only _popish_
confession is, the confession made by a single person to a priest? (And
this itself is in no wise condemned by our church; nay, she recommends
it in some cases) whereas, that _we_ practice, is, the confession
of several persons conjointly, not to a priest, but to each other.
Consequently, it has no analogy at all to _popish_ confession. But the
truth is, this is a stale objection, which many people make against any
thing they do not like. It is all _popery_ out of hand.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account