The works of the Rev. John Wesley, Vol. 15 (of 32)Wesley, John
History
The works of the Rev. John Wesley, Vol. 15 (of 32)
Wesley, John
Methodist Church; Theology -- Early works to 1800; Theology -- History -- 18th century
13. Which of us “fasts every _Friday_ in the year?” Which of us fasts
at all? Does not this shew the present temper of our minds, (though
not of all) soft and unnerved? How then can we advance the work of God,
though we may preach _loud_ and _long_ enough? Here is the root of the
evil. Hence the work of God droops; few are convinced, few justified,
few of our brethren sanctified! Hence more and more doubt, if we are
to be sanctified at all till death: I mean sanctified throughout, saved
from all sin, perfected in love. * That we _may all speak the same
thing_, I ask once for all, Shall we defend this perfection or give it
up? You all agree to defend it; meaning thereby, as we did from the
beginning, salvation from all sin, by the love of God and our neighbour
filling the heart. The _Papists_ say, “This cannot be attained till
we have been a sufficient time in purgatory.” The _Dissenters_ say,
“Nay, it will be attained as soon as the soul and body part.” The
_old Methodists_ said, “It may be attained _before_ we die: a moment
after is too late.” Is it so or no? You are all agreed, we may be saved
from all sin _before death_. The substance then is settled. But as to
the circumstance, is the change instantaneous or gradual? It is both
one and the other. From the moment we are justified, there may be a
_gradual sanctification_ or a growing in grace, a _daily_ advance in
the knowledge and love of God. And if sin cease before death, there
must in the nature of the thing be an instantaneous change. There must
be a last moment wherein it does exist, and a first moment wherein it
does not. But should we in preaching insist on both one and the other?
Certainly we must insist on the _gradual change_; and that ♦earnestly
and continually. And are there not reasons why we should insist on the
_instantaneous_ also? If there be such a blessed change before death,
should we not encourage all believers to expect it? And the rather,
because constant experience shews, the more earnestly they expect
this, the more swiftly and steadily does the gradual work of God go on
in their souls. The more watchful they are against all sin, the more
careful to grow in grace, the more zealous of good works, and the more
punctual in their attendance on all the ordinances of God: whereas just
the contrary effects are observed, whenever this expectation ceases.
They are _saved by hope_, by this hope of a total change saved with a
gradually increasing salvation. Destroy this hope, and that salvation
stands still; or rather decreases daily. Therefore whoever would
advance the _gradual_ change in believers, should strongly insist upon
the _instantaneous_.
♦ “earnesty” replaced with “earnestly”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account