2nd, "A bill for the more perfectly uniting to the crown the Principality of Wales and the County Palatine of Chester, and for the more commodious administration of justice within the same; as also for abolishing certain offices now appertaining thereto, _for quieting dormant claims, ascertaining and securing tenant rights_, and for the sale of all forest lands, and other lands, tenements, and hereditaments, held by his Majesty in right of the said Principality, or County Palatine of Chester, _and for applying the produce thereof to the public service_." 3rd, "A bill for uniting to the crown the Duchy and County Palatine of Lancaster, for the suppression of unnecessary offices now belonging thereto, for the _ascertainment and security of tenant and other rights_, and for the sale of all rents, lands, tenements, and hereditaments, and forests, within the said Duchy and County Palatine, or either of them, _and for applying the produce thereof to the public service_." And it was ordered that Mr. Burke, Mr. Fox, Lord John Cavendish, Sir George Savile, Colonel Barre, Mr. Thomas Townshend, Mr. Byng, Mr. Dunning, Sir Joseph Mawbey, Mr. Recorder of London, Sir Robert Clayton, Mr. Frederick Montagu, the Earl of Upper Ossory, Sir William Guise, and Mr. Gilbert do prepare and bring in the same. At the same time, Mr. Burke moved for leave to bring in-- 4th, "A bill for uniting the Duchy of Cornwall to the crown; for the suppression of certain unnecessary offices now belonging thereto; for the _ascertainment and security of tenant and other rights_; and for the sale of certain rents, lands, and tenements, within or belonging to the said Duchy; _and for applying the produce thereof to the public service_." But some objections being made by the Surveyor-General of the Duchy concerning the rights of the Prince of Wales, now in his minority, and Lord North remaining perfectly silent, Mr. Burke, at length, though he strongly contended against the principle of the objection, consented to withdraw this last motion _for the present_, to be renewed upon an early occasion. FOOTNOTES: [31] This term comprehends various retributions made to persons whose offices are taken away, or who in any other way suffer by the new arrangements that are made. [32] Edict registered 29th January, 1780. [33] Thomas Gilbert, Esq., member for Lichfield. [34] Here Lord North shook his head, and told those who sat near him that Mr. Probert's pension was to depend on his success. It may be so. Mr. Probert's pension was, however, no essential part of the question; nor did Mr. B. care whether he still possessed it or not. His point was, to show the ridicule of attempting an improvement of the Welsh revenue under its present establishment. [35] Case of Richard Lee, Esq., appellant, against George Venables Lord Vernon, respondent, in the year 1775. [36] Vide Lord Talbot's speech in Almon's Parliamentary Register. Vol VII. p. 79, of the Proceedings of the Lords.