[43] Id. 90 usque ad 100. [44] Atkyns, Rep. Vol. I p. 37, Omichund _versus_ Barker. [45] Digest. Lib. XXII. Tit. 5. [46] Calvinus, voce _Praesumptio_. [47] Bartolus [48] Lib. II. Obs. 149, Sec. 9. [49] Lib. I. Obs. 91, Sec. 7. [50] Antiqua jurisprudentia aspera quidem illa, tenebricosa, et tristis, non tam in aequitate quam in verborum superstitione fundata, eaque Ciceronis aetatem fere attigit, mansitque annos circiter CCCL. Quae hanc excepit, viguitque annos fere septuaginta novem, superiori longe humanior; quippe quae magis utilitate communi, quam potestate verborum, negotia moderaretur.--Gravina, p. 86. [51] Omichund _v._ Barker, Atk. I. [52] Gaill, Lib. II. Obs. 20, Sec. 5. [53] N.B.--In some criminal cases also, though not of treason, husband is admitted to prove an assault upon his wife, for the King, ruled by Raymond, Chief-Justice, Trin. 11th Geo., King _v._ Azire. And for various other exceptions see Buller's Nisi Prius, 286, 287. [54] Cro. Charl. 365. [55] Omichund _v._ Barker, 1st Atkyns, ut supra. [56] Rex _v._ Philips, Burrow, Vol. I. p. 301, 302, 304. [57] Mayor of Hull _v._ Horner, Cowper's Reports, 109. [58] Abrahams _v._ Bunn, Burrow, Vol. IV. p. 2254. The whole case well worth reading. [59] Wyndham _v._ Chetwynd, Burrow, Vol. I. p. 421. [60] King _v._ Bray. [61] Wyndham _v._ Chetwynd. [62] Lowe _v._ Joliffe, 1 Black. J. p. 366. [63] Burrow, 1147. Zouch, ex dimiss. Woolston, _v._ Woolston. [64] In this single point Holt did not concur with the rest of the judges. [65] 1st Siderfin, p. 431. [66] Interest reipublicae ut maleficia ne remaneant impunita. [67] Love's Trial, State Trials, Vol. II. p. 144, 171 to 173, and 177; and Foster's Crown Law, p. 235. [68] Coppendale _v._ Bridgen, 2 Burrow, 814. [69] Vide supra. [70] Girdwood's Case, Leach, p. 128. Gordon's Case, Ibid. p. 245. Lord Preston's Case, St. Tr. IV. p. 439. Layer's Case, St. Tr. VI. p. 279. Foster's Crown Law, p. 198. Canning's Trial, St. Tr. X. p. 263, 270. Trial of the Duchess of Kingston, St. Tr. XI. p. 244. Trial of Huggins, St. Tr. IX. p. 119, 120, 135. [71] Harrison's Practice of Chancery, Vol. II. p. 46. 1 Ch. Ca. 228. 1 Ch. Ca. 25. Oughton, Tit. 81, 82, 83. Do. Tit. 116. Viner, Tit. Evidence (P. a.). [72] Carpz. Pract. Saxon. Crimin. Pars III. Quest. CXIV. No. 13. [73] Ibid. Quest. CVI. No. 89. [74] 22 Jac. I. 1624. [75] Morris _v._ Pugh, Burrow, Vol. III. p. 1243. See also Vol. II. Alder _v._ Chip; Vol. IV. Dickson _v._ Fisher; Grey _v._ Smythyes.--N.B. All from the same judge, and proceeding on the same principles. [76] Chesterfield _v._ Janssen, Atkyns's Reports, Vol. II. [77] State Trials, Vol. III. p. 170. [78] Bis in originali. [79] Lords' Journals, 17 Ch. I. Die Sabbati, videlicet, 10º die Aprilis. [80] Dal. 80. Pl. 18. Anno 14 Eliz. apud Viner, Evid. p. 60. [81] State Trials, Vol. IV. p. 501. APPENDIX. No. 1. IN THE CASE OF EARL FERRERS. APRIL 17, 1760. [Foster's Crown Law, p. 188, fol. edit.]