The Works of the Right Honourable Edmund Burke, Vol. 12 (of 12)Burke, Edmund
History
The Works of the Right Honourable Edmund Burke, Vol. 12 (of 12)
Burke, Edmund
Great Britain -- Politics and government -- 1760-1820; Political science -- Early works to 1800
My Lords, I must beg leave to say a few words upon this matter; because
I consider it as one of the most outrageous violations of your
Lordships' dignity, and the greatest insult that was ever offered to a
court of justice. A nudjeeve is a soldier armed with a sword. It appears
in evidence that the Nabob had several corps of nudjeeves in his
service; that the Begums had some nudjeeves; and that Colonel Hannay had
a corps of nudjeeves. It is well known that every prince in Hindostan
has soldiers of that description,--in like manner, probably, as the
princes of Europe have their guards. The whole, then, amounts to this:
that a story told by two men who were wounded in an action far from the
place from which they were supposed to come, who were not regularly
examined, not cross-examined, not even kept for examination, and whose
evidence was never reported, is to be a reason why you are to believe
that these Begums were concerned in a rebellion against their son, and
deserved to forfeit all their lands and goods, and to suffer the
indignities that we have stated.
My Lords, I am really ashamed to mention so scandalous a thing; but let
us put a case: let us suppose that we had accused Mr. Hastings of
instigating the Rajah of Berar to fall upon some of the country powers,
and that the evidence we produced at your bar to prove it was, that an
officer had taken two nudjeeves, who declared they were instigated by
Mr. Hastings to go into the service of that Rajah: could you bear such a
thing? would you suffer such evidence to be produced? or do you think
that we should have so little regard for our own reputation as to
venture to produce such evidence before you? Again, we have charged Mr.
Hastings with committing several acts of violence against the Begums.
Let us suppose our proof to be, that two persons who never appeared
before nor since, that two grenadiers in English uniforms, (which would
be a great deal stronger than the case of the nudjeeves, because they
have no particular uniform belonging to them,) that two English
grenadiers, I say, had been taken prisoners in some action and let go
again, who said that Mr. Hastings had instigated them to make war upon
the Begums: would your Lordships suffer such evidence to be produced
before you? No. And yet two of the first women in India are to be
stripped of all they have in the world upon no better evidence than that
which you would utterly reject. You would not disgrace the British
peerage, you would not disgrace this court of justice, you would not
disgrace human reason itself, by confiscating, on such evidence, the
meanest property of the meanest wretch. You would not subject to the
smallest fine for the smallest delinquency, upon such evidence. I will
venture to say, that, in an action of assault and battery, or in an
action for the smallest sum, such evidence would be scouted as odious
and contemptible, even supposing that a perfect reliance might be placed
upon its truth.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account